these modems from the CodeRED worm is to change the port the web
interface is listening on.
Cisco seems to be doing these kinds of boneheaded things for quite sometime.
--
*Alaric Dailey* Everyone deserves privacy.
Thawte ‘Web of Trust’ Notary Seal <http://www.thawte.com/wot> • T
see the same flaw, with ATMs
websites or anything else, a shared key isn't a secret, and if you are
professing it is, how are you to know it hasn't been comprimised?
Anne & Lynn Wheeler wrote:
>Alaric Dailey wrote:
> > ATMs would be infeasible if they were not a 2 factor a
Peter Gutmann wrote:
>Alaric Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>
>>While I admit that PKI is flawed, I don't see anyway that PSK could used
>>effectively.
>>
>>How are PSKs going to be shared in a secure way?
>>are we talking about gene
thing usable
handed off to an attacker. Furthermore the site could be sure of the
users identity, something none of the other solutions I have seen
address.
--
Pengdows eMail Signature
>
> Think "end-to-end".. Even jabber has a way to encrypt messages
> end-to-end using
> user certificates (or PGP).
>
> -derek
>
I am aware of Jabbers support for GPG/PGP, but did I miss their support
for user certificates? I have seen no indication of such support, what
client supports it?
Alar
Tim Dierks wrote:
>[resending due to e-mail address / cryptography list membership issue]
>
>On 8/24/05, Ian G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Once you've configured iChat to connect to the Google Talk service, you may
>>receive a warning message that states your username and password will be
>
