[John here. Let's try some speculation about what this phrase, fabricating
digital keys, might mean.]
My own, personal guess is that it is obfuscation which translates as using
passwords or accessing a portal over SSL plus we're too embarrassed to
admit that it was that easy.
--
Original post with nicer pics:
http://www.reddit.com/r/reddit.com/comments/dmh5s/does_this_mean_the_fbi_is_after_us/
Semi-relevant government pricelist:
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=st820ec+site:.gov
-a
--
alec.muff...@gmail.com
I found the following Adium-based solution for layering OTR atop Skype
IM:
http://www.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Full-Disclosure/2008-06/msg00224.html
...and was wondering whether anyone has generalised this by creating
some open-source, standalone, simple application which talks to the
In Disk Utility - New Image, select size, properties and encryption
type (AES 128 or 256) and Create.
Then mount and use your encrypted disks as needed.
Just as an aside: on 10.5 and upwards I have taken to using encrypted
sparse bundles rather than simple images; the advantage of doing
Perry: plasma physics is wildly OT but I believe the relevance will be
obvious to those who remember the crypto wars, especially when they
hit the fifth paragraph:
It’s a difficult subject: many people I interviewed felt Roth showed
blatant disregard for the law — he was warned his work
On 8 Dec 2008, at 21:13, JOHN GALT wrote:
The iconic Paper explaining this is Why Johnny Can't Encrypt
available here: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1251435
Orlbaq gur Jul Wbuaal cncre - sbphfvat hcba hfnovyvgl - V guvax
gurer vf n uvture ceboyrz bs vagrebcrenovyvgl naq
Disclaimer: Yes, I am referenced, but I've been blarting about this for nearly
two years now, and nobody's paid the slighest notice before; the matter of
making website security both a) easy and b) better can now only become *more*
urgent.
