Re: [css-d] left justified UL

2006-06-02 Thread Dave Pierce
Roger Roelofs rapidly wrote: > #left, #main, #right { float: left; width: 180px; margin-left: 30px; } > /* the padding-top value may be unnecessary once the html is fixed */ > #left { margin-left: 25px; padding-top: 1em;} > #main { width: 150px; } > > #left ul, #right ul, #main ul { margin: 0; pa

Re: [css-d] left justified UL

2006-06-01 Thread Roger Roelofs
Dave, On Jun 1, 2006, at 4:39 PM, Dave Pierce wrote: > On this site... http://www.lorettosedgwick.org/ ... the client has > now requested that the list be flush left with the heading, but now > the overflow wraps down and to the left to line up with the bullet > image. Can this be fixed? You

Re: [css-d] left justified UL

2006-06-01 Thread Dave Pierce
Don rapidly wrote: > Why not just make a list with no symbol in front? That way you > automatically get a 2 line link to line up. Don, I'd love to. But the client wants that "special" diamond there. They asked me to design these links with three different symbols, didn't like what they wanted,

[css-d] left justified UL

2006-06-01 Thread Dave Pierce
Hi group, On this site... http://www.lorettosedgwick.org/ ...which many of you have helped me create through your expert knowledge, the client has now requested that the list be flush left with the heading, no margins/padding. So I did that but now the overflow wraps down and to the left to

[css-d] left justified UL

2006-05-31 Thread Dave Pierce
> (Somebody shoot me...they're making MORE changes!) On this site, > which many of you have helped me create through your expert knowledge, > the client requested that the list be flush left with the heading, no > margins/padding. So I did that but the overflow wraps down and to the > left to