Re: [CTRL] No Right to Bare Arms (Supreme Court)

2000-09-07 Thread nessie
[EMAIL PROTECTED],Internet writes: > > >that the >second amendement is an INDIVIDUAL right, and that this right as >established by the court Aside from whether or not the courts or the Constitution guarantees the right to bear arms, the arms themselves guarantee the right to bear arms. Any

Re: [CTRL] No Right to Bare Arms (Supreme Court)

2000-09-07 Thread Theodor Parada, MD
On 7 Sep 00, at 18:34, Theodor Parada, MD wrote: The end of my statement should also say ; "that this right predates the US Constitution and bill of rights. > It's amazing what a little redaction can do, so as to misconstrue and > twist the argument in one's favor. If you read any of these cases

Re: [CTRL] No Right to Bare Arms (Supreme Court)

2000-09-07 Thread Theodor Parada, MD
It's amazing what a little redaction can do, so as to misconstrue and twist the argument in one's favor. If you read any of these cases cited here, in there entirety and pay particular attention to the words before and after the portions cited and check the citations within those cases, it becomes

[CTRL] No Right to Bare Arms (Supreme Court)

2000-09-07 Thread Donald Park
C. 20530 August 22, 2000 Dear Mr. : Thank you for your letter dated August 11, 2000, in which you question certain statements you understand to have been made by an attorney for the United States during oral argument before the Fifth Circuit in United States v. Emerson. Your letter states t