Re: Is /usr/src/cygutils-1.4.6-1.cygport is out of date?

2011-10-28 Thread Charles Wilson
On 10/28/2011 1:20 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: >> Fixed. > > The alternative is not to bother with tarballs and fetch it from CVS > instead: > > CVS_URI=":pserver:anon...@cygwin.com:/cvs/cygwin-apps" > CVS_BRANCH=v${PV//./_} > inherit cvs > > HOMEPAGE="http://cygutils.fruitbat.org/cygutils-pack

Re: Is /usr/src/cygutils-1.4.6-1.cygport is out of date?

2011-10-27 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On Fri, 2011-10-28 at 00:29 -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: > On 10/25/2011 11:26 PM, Charles Wilson wrote: > > On 10/25/2011 8:58 PM, Regid Ichira wrote: > >> Don't HOMEPAGE and SRC_URI carry only up to 1.4.2 ? > >> I wonder if the other information is up to date. > > > > Nah, I've just been forgetti

Re: Is /usr/src/cygutils-1.4.6-1.cygport is out of date?

2011-10-27 Thread Charles Wilson
On 10/25/2011 11:26 PM, Charles Wilson wrote: On 10/25/2011 8:58 PM, Regid Ichira wrote: Don't HOMEPAGE and SRC_URI carry only up to 1.4.2 ? I wonder if the other information is up to date. Nah, I've just been forgetting to upload the "basic" tarballs. Since there is a one-to-one correspondenc

Re: Is /usr/src/cygutils-1.4.6-1.cygport is out of date?

2011-10-25 Thread Charles Wilson
On 10/25/2011 8:58 PM, Regid Ichira wrote: Don't HOMEPAGE and SRC_URI carry only up to 1.4.2 ? I wonder if the other information is up to date. $ cat /usr/src/cygutils-1.4.6-1.cygport DESCRIPTION="A collection of small but useful utilties for cygwin" HOMEPAGE="http://cygutils.fruitbat.org/cy

Is /usr/src/cygutils-1.4.6-1.cygport is out of date?

2011-10-25 Thread Regid Ichira
Don't HOMEPAGE and SRC_URI carry only up to 1.4.2 ? I wonder if the other information is up to date. $ cat /usr/src/cygutils-1.4.6-1.cygport DESCRIPTION="A collection of small but useful utilties for cygwin" HOMEPAGE="http://cygutils.fruitbat.org/cygutils-package/index.html"; SRC_URI="http://cy