RE: Re: Problems with .exe files

2003-10-16 Thread Kris Thielemans
oops. that went off too fast. ignore previous email. sorry Hi Andrew > Why would you think that you can cp t as just "t" but you'd > have to touch "t.exe"? > The real name of the file is t.exe, for touch, cp, rm, etc. The > only time that just "t" suffices is for exec. > Because it used to w

Re: Problems with .exe files

2003-10-16 Thread Kris Thielemans
> Why would you think that you can cp t as just "t" but you'd have to touch "t.exe"? > The real name of the file is t.exe, for touch, cp, rm, etc. The only time that just > "t" suffices is for exec. Because it used to work on older cygwin. I suspect exactly to get Makefile and other automated pro

Re: Problems with .exe files

2003-10-15 Thread Andrew DeFaria
Kris Thielemans wrote: Hi Since upgrading cygwin a few days ago, I can no longer cp .exe files if I don't use the .exe suffix. I can reproduce this as follows: $ mkdir a $ touch t.exe $ cp t a cp: `t' and `a/t' are the same file $ cp t somenonexistingfilename cp: 't' and 'somenonexistingfilename

Problems with .exe files

2003-10-15 Thread Kris Thielemans
Hi Since upgrading cygwin a few days ago, I can no longer cp .exe files if I don't use the .exe suffix. I can reproduce this as follows: $ mkdir a $ touch t.exe $ cp t a cp: `t' and `a/t' are the same file $ cp t somenonexistingfilename cp: 't' and 'somenonexistingfilename' are the same file I a