On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 12:23:25PM +0800, Shaddy Baddah wrote:
>Allow me to correct myself before someone else does.
>
>Shaddy Baddah wrote:
>>My interpretation is drawn from the fact that the default make target
>>does make a call to texi2html, and therefore will fail.
>
>I am doubly wrong :-(, be
On 5/11/05, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 11:01:38AM +0800, Shaddy Baddah wrote:
> >Shaddy Baddah wrote:
> >> It seems that texi2html has dropped out/moved out of the binary package.
> >> Is this deliberate? Where should I look for it now?
> >
> >Sorry if this seems like impat
Hi,
Allow me to correct myself before someone else does.
Shaddy Baddah wrote:
> My interpretation is drawn from the fact that the default make target
> does make a call to texi2html, and therefore will fail.
I am doubly wrong :-(, because it will/does not fail. The exit status of
the texi2html c
Hi,
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> The Cygwin DLL build does NOT have a dependency on texi2html. The Cygwin
> documentation directory does have such a dependency but I don't see why
> this is a severe problem.
You are right, the DLL itself does not have a dependency on texi2html.
That is my interpr
Hi,
Larry Hall wrote:
> Why wait? Just download 'tetex-bin-2.0.2-15', 'bunzip2' it, and extract the
> executable from there using 'tar'. If you had previously installed that
> version on your machine, you can skip the downloading and just go straight
> to your local package directory for it. A
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 11:01:38AM +0800, Shaddy Baddah wrote:
>Shaddy Baddah wrote:
>> It seems that texi2html has dropped out/moved out of the binary package.
>> Is this deliberate? Where should I look for it now?
>
>Sorry if this seems like impatience, but I am not sure I captured the
>severity
At 11:01 PM 5/11/2005, you wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Shaddy Baddah wrote:
>> It seems that texi2html has dropped out/moved out of the binary package.
>> Is this deliberate? Where should I look for it now?
>
>Sorry if this seems like impatience, but I am not sure I captured the
>severity of this problem in my
Hi,
Shaddy Baddah wrote:
> It seems that texi2html has dropped out/moved out of the binary package.
> Is this deliberate? Where should I look for it now?
Sorry if this seems like impatience, but I am not sure I captured the
severity of this problem in my original email... and since response has
b
8 matches
Mail list logo