On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 11:42:48AM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Hallo,
Is someone willing to maintain NASM, the netwide assembler?
You?
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL
From: Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 04:35
Subject: RE: Setup.exe release-candidate
-Original Message-
From: Max Bowsher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 11:32 PM
At 11:00
I have no objection if the original contributors want to take the
cygutils source package, rip out everything that isn't (for instance)
'mkshortcut'-related, and release a standalone autotool'ed mkshortcut.
(However, I'm not pushing for that.)
Personally, I feel a good test is whether it's
Checked into branch and trunk. I uploaded a new version of setup.exe to
sources.redhat.com, too, since this was affecting setup.ini creation.
cgf
2002-03-19 Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Makefile.in (setup_version.c): Add back magic which allows detection
of
On Win98, setup concludes rather badly.
In previous incarnations, setup would launch a DOS window. Quite often
that would freeze my machine, reasons unclear. However, it was possible
to murder winoldap using the three-finger-salute and that would return
me to normal functioning - usually
- Original Message -
From: Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: CygWin-Apps [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 22:24
Subject: Re: release setup now?
I think so. I know of two minor (non-show-stopper) nits:
1) IF (and only if) folks
Thanks.
Robert Collins wrote:
Someone mentioned this a while back... did anything come of that?
That would be me.
I proposed to package it, send a setup.hint. And added a task to follow
up on it and count the votes.
I even made a package -- I just forget that it's not enough to have a
TODO list.
Do they have cygwin versions? Are they interested in having it available
via setup.exe?
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 2:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RFP: NASM
I kinda thought the people at nasm.2y.net
appears to be in a lib category, not libs.
Rob
Thanks Michael - do you want to put that somewhere on the web (it could
be at www.cygwin.com), and we can advise the cygwin crowd that
tested... that they should run this?
Cheers,
Rob
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 02:38:51PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
Thanks Michael - do you want to put that somewhere on the web (it could
be at www.cygwin.com), and we can advise the cygwin crowd that
tested... that they should run this?
You can submit an announcement or submit it as software.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 2:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: release setup now?
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 02:38:51PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
Thanks Michael - do you want to put that
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 10:58:37PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
appears to be in a lib category, not libs.
oops. I'll fix it when I get home (yep, still at work...)
I fixed it already, Chuck. I didn't think you'd mind.
cgf
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 03:17:42PM +1100, Billinghurst, David (CRTS) wrote:
Building gcc-3.1 now requires texinfo-4.1. It builds OOTB. If there
are no objections I will package it up over the weekend and submit it.
Thanks for the offer but I'm all set up to handle this.
I may rethink this if
-Original Message-
From: Hack Kampbjørn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 12:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ssh Keychain?
Robert Collins wrote:
Someone mentioned this a while back... did anything come of that?
That would be me.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 03:17:42PM +1100, Billinghurst, David (CRTS) wrote:
Building gcc-3.1 now requires texinfo-4.1. It builds OOTB. If there
are no objections I will package it up over the weekend and submit it.
Can you actually build texinfo-4.1, David? I can't build it on either
linux or
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 04:24:02PM +1100, Billinghurst, David (CRTS) wrote:
Built it about 6 times already (for various sad reasons).
/usr/local/src/texinfo-4.1/configure --prefix=/usr
make
make install
Yeah, I figured it out. It doesn't like being cross-compiled. I forgot about
that.
Do they have cygwin versions? Are they interested in having it available
via setup.exe?
Rob
*shrug* they have a forum - the version compiles with cygwin without a
hitch... most recent is 0.98.22 (I'm pretty sure)
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 04:13:06PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 3:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: And we have a xfree cygwin package.. (What are
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 4:24 PM
I don't see any reason to delay adopting XFree86 into the
main setup. So, lets not worry about customizing anything or
offering alternate setup.ini's.
I don't see
Building gcc-3.1 now requires texinfo-4.1. It builds OOTB. If there are no
objections I will package it up over the weekend and submit it.
22 matches
Mail list logo