Christopher Faylor wrote:
Why are you mentioning this here? It doesn't seem to be an actual cygwin
package nomination.
I didn't think it belonged on the general list. Where would you like it?
--
Joe Buehler
Just ran and update of my cygwin tree, it appears that
squid has stopped working. note that i have already upped
my file descriptor limit. thanks. jake
499 [~] uname -a
CYGWIN_NT-5.1 sundowner 1.5.4(0.94/3/2) 2003-09-12 23:08 i686 unknown
unknown Cygwin
500 [~] squid -v
Squid Cache: Version 2.4.S
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 06:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Just ran and update of my cygwin tree, it appears that
> squid has stopped working. note that i have already upped
> my file descriptor limit. thanks. jake
This is possibly a cygwin1.5 thing, I'm planning a new build of squid
this weekend, as
> From: Sam Steingold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 18 September 2003 7:26 AM
> To: Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS)
> Subject: Re: new package proposal: CLISP
> maybe you could be interested in maintaining cygwin packages of both
> CLISP and Maxima? it appears that you are the natural
