wget -e robots=off -np -nH --cut-dirs=1 -R'index.html*' -r \
http://franke.dvrdns.org/cygwin/x86/release/cdrkit \
http://franke.dvrdns.org/cygwin/x86_64/release/cdrkit
The former (x86) "cdrkit" package is now marked obsolete and replaced by
"cdrkit-doc".
An x86_64 "cdrkit" package does not
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 08:29:44PM +0200, Achim Gratz wrote:
>Christopher Faylor writes:
>> The only differences in most of the arch-specific packages in Fedora are
>> the addition of a x86_64 and i686 to the package name. I think it would
>> be a good idea for us to do that too but it would requi
(Packaging algol68g)
There are two warnings at the end:
*** Warning: setup.hint is missing
*** Warning: algol68g.hint is missing
What's the latter (algol68g.hint)?
The file setup.hint is in the same directory as the cygport file where
I invoked cygport. Does it need to be included in the package?
LS,
packages for gsl-1.16-1 are available here for upload:
wget -nH -np -r --cut-dirs=2
http://members.quicknet.nl/ar.burgers/cygwin/x86/gsl/
find x86 -name "index.html*" | xargs rm
wget -nH -np -r --cut-dirs=2
http://members.quicknet.nl/ar.burgers/cygwin/x86_64/gsl/
find x86_64 -name "index.
Christopher Faylor writes:
> The only differences in most of the arch-specific packages in Fedora are
> the addition of a x86_64 and i686 to the package name. I think it would
> be a good idea for us to do that too but it would require changes to
> upset, genini and setup.exe.
...and cygport. BT
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 09:35:55AM +0200, Thomas Wolff wrote:
>I had written:
>> >I think it is really not a good idea to have the same name for archives
>> >of different packages. No other systems I know does this.
>Christopher Faylor responded (for some reason not in my mailbox):
>> Just to kill
On Aug 14 16:04, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Aug 14 09:43, Steve Rowley wrote:
> > However, /usr/bin/lockfile is still missing. Unpacking the procmail
> > 3.22-12 tarball reveals that it contains only the
> > /usr/share/doc/procmail/ directory, and 4 small documentation files.
> > The rest of pro
On Aug 14 10:09, Thomas Wolff wrote:
> Am 14.08.2013 09:49, schrieb Corinna Vinschen:
> >On Aug 14 09:40, Thomas Wolff wrote:
> >>...
> >>
> >>Update:
> >>#src:
> >>wget http://towo.net/algol68g/algol68g-2.7-0-src.tar.bz2
> >>#32bit:
> >>wget http://towo.net/algol68g/32/algol68g-2.7-0.tar.bz2
> >>#
Am 14.08.2013 09:49, schrieb Corinna Vinschen:
On Aug 14 09:40, Thomas Wolff wrote:
...
Update:
#src:
wget http://towo.net/algol68g/algol68g-2.7-0-src.tar.bz2
#32bit:
wget http://towo.net/algol68g/32/algol68g-2.7-0.tar.bz2
#64bit:
wget http://towo.net/algol68g/64/algol68g-2.7-0.tar.bz2
Thanks.
On Aug 14 09:40, Thomas Wolff wrote:
>
> >>Il 8/11/2013 7:02 PM, Thomas Wolff ha scritto:
> >>>Please upload the updated packages for algol68g (both 32 and 64 bit):
> >>>
> >>>...
> >
> >I have managed meanwhile to package algol68g completely with
> >cygport (see my other thread which I will respo
Il 8/11/2013 7:02 PM, Thomas Wolff ha scritto:
Please upload the updated packages for algol68g (both 32 and 64 bit):
...
I have managed meanwhile to package algol68g completely with cygport
(see my other thread which I will respond later) and will provide
another upload.
Update:
#src:
wge
I had written:
>I think it is really not a good idea to have the same name for archives
>of different packages. No other systems I know does this.
Christopher Faylor responded (for some reason not in my mailbox):
Just to kill two birds with one stone:
http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/dl.fedo
12 matches
Mail list logo
