Jon Turney wrote:
On 28/08/2023 16:12, Christian Franke via Cygwin-apps wrote:
Christian Franke wrote:
A small step towards reproducible packaging...
Thanks very much for this. Sorry for taking so long to look at it.
No problem.
A few questions and suggestions interspersed
[...]
--
On 28/08/2023 16:12, Christian Franke via Cygwin-apps wrote:
Christian Franke wrote:
A small step towards reproducible packaging...
Thanks very much for this. Sorry for taking so long to look at it.
A few questions and suggestions interspersed
[...]
--
Regards,
Christian
0001-Add-initia
ASSI via Cygwin-apps wrote:
Christian Franke via Cygwin-apps writes:
If the build-path changes, more files differ (cygcheck.exe, ldd.exe,
cygserver.exe) because __FILE__ is used and expands to an absolute
path name.
This could be fixed by adding -fmacro-prefix and/or -ffile-prefix arguments.
Christian Franke via Cygwin-apps writes:
> If the build-path changes, more files differ (cygcheck.exe, ldd.exe,
> cygserver.exe) because __FILE__ is used and expands to an absolute
> path name.
This could be fixed by adding -fmacro-prefix and/or -ffile-prefix arguments.
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+
Christian Franke wrote:
A small step towards reproducible packaging...
Currently only tested with upcoming smartmontools package - contains
only exe, man, doc files (no dll, lib, ...). Multiple cygport runs
produce binary identical distribution tarballs if SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH
(from the past) is
ASSI via Cygwin-apps wrote:
Christian Franke via Cygwin-apps writes:
If binutils, gzip and tar also would support this, the patch would be
empty :-)
GZip has -n though ...
For gzip I decided to keep the timestamp and use (the GNU version of)
touch instead.
and GNU tar --mtime and --clamp
Christian Franke via Cygwin-apps writes:
> If binutils, gzip and tar also would support this, the patch would be
> empty :-)
GZip has -n though and GNU tar --mtime and --clamp-mtime, so why not use
that?
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+
Wa
Brian Inglis via Cygwin-apps wrote:
On 2023-08-23 11:39, Christian Franke via Cygwin-apps wrote:
A small step towards reproducible packaging...
Currently only tested with upcoming smartmontools package - contains
only exe, man, doc files (no dll, lib, ...). Multiple cygport runs
produce binar
On 2023-08-23 11:39, Christian Franke via Cygwin-apps wrote:
A small step towards reproducible packaging...
Currently only tested with upcoming smartmontools package - contains only exe,
man, doc files (no dll, lib, ...). Multiple cygport runs produce binary
identical distribution tarballs if
A small step towards reproducible packaging...
Currently only tested with upcoming smartmontools package - contains
only exe, man, doc files (no dll, lib, ...). Multiple cygport runs
produce binary identical distribution tarballs if SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH
(from the past) is specified in the cygport
10 matches
Mail list logo