Warren Young wrote:
> Then other
> package maintainers can rebuild for libexpat1 at their leisure. Unless,
> that is, it's a big deal to port to expat 2?
I believe it's merely a matter of rebuilding.
Max.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Warren Young wrote:
Brian Dessent wrote:
Otherwise, you potentially violate the GPL licensing requirement to
provide the source as it would disappear from the mirrors entirely as
new 'foo' versions pushed the old one off.
So what I need to do, then, is rebuild the 1.95.8 package so it _only_
Warren Young wrote:
> > Otherwise, you potentially violate the GPL licensing requirement to
> > provide the source as it would disappear from the mirrors entirely as
> > new 'foo' versions pushed the old one off.
>
> So what I need to do, then, is rebuild the 1.95.8 package so it _only_
> builds
Brian Dessent wrote:
Otherwise, you potentially violate the GPL licensing requirement to
provide the source as it would disappear from the mirrors entirely as
new 'foo' versions pushed the old one off.
So what I need to do, then, is rebuild the 1.95.8 package so it _only_
builds the DLL packag
Warren Young wrote:
> Yes, but the package name changed, so I think all I have to do is ensure
> the RFU request says to leave libexpat0 alone, right? Then other
> package maintainers can rebuild for libexpat1 at their leisure. Unless,
> that is, it's a big deal to port to expat 2?
There's more
Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) wrote:
For those that may be interested in adoption, there are updated versions
of some of these now in Ports:
Okay, thanks for the leg up. I'm guessing you'll keep maintaining these
packages? I started my versions from yours, but had to remove several
features becaus
Max Bowsher wrote:
It's a most bizarre and quirky buildsystem that I've never seen any
other package use.
Yeah, and it seems to require a little more handholding in 1.5.5.
* expat
I can do this one, but I'm concerned because expat.sf.net isn't
responding right now. Did expat die again whi
On 4/30/2008 3:45 PM, Max Bowsher wrote:
Warren Young wrote:
All my packages are generic-build-script based.
I *think* that the base g-b-s version for each should be as follows:
apache2, apr1, aprutil1, subversion: CVS r1.47
I have a .cygport for subversion-1.4.6 if anyone's interested. I'm
w
Warren Young wrote:
> Max Bowsher wrote:
>>
>> * doxygen
>
> I'm interested, contingent on seeing what it takes to build it.
It's a most bizarre and quirky buildsystem that I've never seen any
other package use.
>> * expat
>
> I can do this one, but I'm concerned because expat.sf.net isn't
>
> Max Bowsher writes:
> * neon
Will take this one, it's needed by cadaver.
Ciao
Volker
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Warren Young wrote:
> Please email me the package build scripts, and brief instructions on
> their use. I maintain the ctags package, but do so with hand-rolled
> tools due to weirdnesses of its build system. So, I know how to build
> Cygwin packages, but I don't know how to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
For those that may be interested in adoption, there are updated versions
of some of these now in Ports:
| * apr1 & aprutil1
http://cygwin-ports.cvs.sourceforge.net/cygwin-ports/ports/libs/apr1/
http://cygwin-ports.cvs.sourceforge.net/cygwin-ports
Max Bowsher wrote:
* doxygen
I'm interested, contingent on seeing what it takes to build it.
* expat
I can do this one, but I'm concerned because expat.sf.net isn't
responding right now. Did expat die again while I wasn't looking?
* sqlite3
I know very little about using SQLite d
On Apr 30 04:20, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> On Wed, April 30, 2008 3:27 am, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> According to Max Bowsher on 4/29/2008 4:47 PM:
> >> | Farewell, of sorts, and thanks everyone for helping make Windows a
> >> nice | place to be the past many years!
> >
> > Sad ACK. I've
On Wed, April 30, 2008 3:27 am, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> According to Max Bowsher on 4/29/2008 4:47 PM:
>> | Farewell, of sorts, and thanks everyone for helping make Windows a
>> nice | place to be the past many years!
>
> Sad ACK. I've marked all your packages as orphaned now.
Would not a fare
On Apr 29 22:34, Eric Blake wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> According to Max Bowsher on 4/29/2008 4:47 PM:
> | Accordingly I'm putting my packages up for adoption:
> |
> | * patchutils
>
> I use this enough to warrant adopting it.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Max Bowsher on 4/29/2008 4:47 PM:
| Accordingly I'm putting my packages up for adoption:
|
| * patchutils
I use this enough to warrant adopting it. I'll post an ITA soon (although
since it hasn't changed upstream, I&
maintenance in the future.
Accordingly I'm putting my packages up for adoption:
* apache2
* apr1 & aprutil1
* doxygen
* expat
* neon
* patchutils
* sqlite3
* subversion
* swig
I'll be keeping an eye on the list, if people want to ask any questions
about the packages, and until adop
18 matches
Mail list logo
