Re: realpath: cygutils or coreutils?

2012-02-09 Thread Eric Blake
On 02/09/2012 11:27 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 02:12 -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: >> On 2/6/2012 11:49 AM, Eric Blake wrote: >>> I've uploaded coreutils-8.15-1 as a test release; I can kick it over to >>> current once you've got a cygutils release to match. >> >> cygutils-

Re: realpath: cygutils or coreutils?

2012-02-09 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 02:12 -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: > On 2/6/2012 11:49 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > > I've uploaded coreutils-8.15-1 as a test release; I can kick it over to > > current once you've got a cygutils release to match. > > cygutils-1.4.8-1 is uploaded as a test release. > * Integrate

Re: realpath: cygutils or coreutils?

2012-02-08 Thread Charles Wilson
On 2/6/2012 11:49 AM, Eric Blake wrote: I've uploaded coreutils-8.15-1 as a test release; I can kick it over to current once you've got a cygutils release to match. cygutils-1.4.8-1 is uploaded as a test release. * Integrate cygstart with FD.o menu and mimetype system. (Yaakov Selkowitz) * Re

Re: realpath: cygutils or coreutils?

2012-02-06 Thread Eric Blake
On 02/05/2012 01:53 PM, Charles Wilson wrote: > On 1/30/2012 7:01 PM, Charles Wilson wrote: >> On 1/30/2012 3:32 PM, Eric Blake wrote: >>> In particular, it is much more powerful than the realpath(1) currently >>> offered by cygutils. Should I build my next coreutils package with >>> realpath incl

Re: realpath: cygutils or coreutils?

2012-02-05 Thread Charles Wilson
On 1/30/2012 7:01 PM, Charles Wilson wrote: On 1/30/2012 3:32 PM, Eric Blake wrote: In particular, it is much more powerful than the realpath(1) currently offered by cygutils. Should I build my next coreutils package with realpath included, and wait to upload it until we can coordinate a build

Re: realpath: cygutils or coreutils?

2012-02-05 Thread Charles Wilson
On 1/30/2012 8:50 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: While you're at it, what about ascii(1)? http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2011-10/msg00113.html Nobody ever responded to my comments at the end of that thread, so it kinda went into limbo. Given two +1 votes (your own and Christian Franke's) i'

Re: realpath: cygutils or coreutils?

2012-01-30 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 19:01 -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: > On 1/30/2012 3:32 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > > In particular, it is much more powerful than the realpath(1) currently > > offered by cygutils. Should I build my next coreutils package with > > realpath included, and wait to upload it until we

Re: realpath: cygutils or coreutils?

2012-01-30 Thread Eric Blake
On 01/30/2012 05:01 PM, Charles Wilson wrote: > On 1/30/2012 3:32 PM, Eric Blake wrote: >> In particular, it is much more powerful than the realpath(1) currently >> offered by cygutils. Should I build my next coreutils package with >> realpath included, and wait to upload it until we can coordinat

Re: realpath: cygutils or coreutils?

2012-01-30 Thread Charles Wilson
On 1/30/2012 3:32 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > In particular, it is much more powerful than the realpath(1) currently > offered by cygutils. Should I build my next coreutils package with > realpath included, and wait to upload it until we can coordinate a build > with cygutils dropping the weaker varia

realpath: cygutils or coreutils?

2012-01-30 Thread Eric Blake
Upstream coreutils 8.15 added a new realpath(1) utility: > Usage: src/realpath [OPTION]... FILE... > Print the resolved absolute file name; > all but the last component must exist > > -e, --canonicalize-existing all components of the path must exist > -m, --canonicalize-missing no componen