On Jul 10 18:31, David Allsopp via Cygwin-patches wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Jul 10 15:22, David Allsopp via Cygwin-patches wrote:
> > > Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > > On Jul 9 20:30, David Allsopp via Cygwin-patches wrote:
> > > > > I have some code where the acl_t returned by
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 10 15:22, David Allsopp via Cygwin-patches wrote:
> > Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > On Jul 9 20:30, David Allsopp via Cygwin-patches wrote:
> > > > I have some code where the acl_t returned by get_file_acl is
> > > > allocated at 0x80038248. As a result the
On Jul 10 15:22, David Allsopp via Cygwin-patches wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Jul 9 20:30, David Allsopp via Cygwin-patches wrote:
> > > I have some code where the acl_t returned by get_file_acl is allocated
> > > at 0x80038248. As a result the acl_entry_t generated by acl_get_entry
>
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 9 20:30, David Allsopp via Cygwin-patches wrote:
> > I have some code where the acl_t returned by get_file_acl is allocated
> > at 0x80038248. As a result the acl_entry_t generated by acl_get_entry
> > has an "index" of -1, since the pointer was sign-extended to
On Jul 9 20:30, David Allsopp via Cygwin-patches wrote:
> I have some code where the acl_t returned by get_file_acl is allocated at
> 0x80038248. As a result the acl_entry_t generated by acl_get_entry has an
> "index" of -1, since the pointer was sign-extended to 64-bits.
>
> My fix is trivial
I have some code where the acl_t returned by get_file_acl is allocated at
0x80038248. As a result the acl_entry_t generated by acl_get_entry has an
"index" of -1, since the pointer was sign-extended to 64-bits.
My fix is trivial and simply casts the pointer to uintptr_t first.
All best,
David
