I'll also chime in as a lurker to say that you have kicked some major
ass for us Cygwin/XFree86 users, Harold, and I think you've been nothing
but helpful and responsive on the list. I think your plea on the
XFree86 list was reasonable. Good luck as you explore other options.
Harold L Hunt II <[
Daniel,
Armbrust, Daniel C. wrote:
Harold,
I have been lurking on this list for a while now. I don't know much about XFree86, or the politics, or any history. But I read the threads that led up to your decision. I applaud you. You asked for something completely reasonable, and (pardon the l
Harold,
I have been lurking on this list for a while now. I don't know much about XFree86, or
the politics, or any history. But I read the threads that led up to your decision. I
applaud you. You asked for something completely reasonable, and (pardon the language)
David Dawes came off as a
Egbert,
Egbert Eich wrote:
Harold,
I find it sad that you had to make this decision.
I've just been absent for a little more than two weeks and
was unable to commit patches - look what came out of it.
Egbert, I am sorry, I want to make it absolutely clear that my raising
the issue with XFree86.
Harold,
I find it sad that you had to make this decision.
I've just been absent for a little more than two weeks and
was unable to commit patches - look what came out of it.
I understand that the level of frustration among contributors
has risen to a point that people are starting to use bad wor
Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Mitch,
Mitchell Skinner wrote:
I followed the [EMAIL PROTECTED] discussion and the xwin.org and
xouvert.org bits, and at first I wasn't sure if the complainers had a
real beef or if the hubbub was the outcome of some bizarre historical
politics, but it's becoming clearer
Mitch,
Mitchell Skinner wrote:
FWIW,
I read the cygwin-xfree mailing list archives from time to time, and I
just read the [EMAIL PROTECTED] thread linked from /., and it looks to
me like Harold was being pretty reasonable and was getting a terrible
response.
Thanks. It was so weird to write what
FWIW,
I read the cygwin-xfree mailing list archives from time to time, and I
just read the [EMAIL PROTECTED] thread linked from /., and it looks to
me like Harold was being pretty reasonable and was getting a terrible
response.
I followed the [EMAIL PROTECTED] discussion and the xwin.org and
xouv
Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 11:35:20AM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
6) Alternatives are being evaluated for hosting Cygwin/XFree86 code in
CVS. Hosts that can provide CVS commit access for at least five
Cygwin/XFree86 developers will be given priority.
Harold,
I thought
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 11:35:20AM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> 6) Alternatives are being evaluated for hosting Cygwin/XFree86 code in
> CVS. Hosts that can provide CVS commit access for at least five
> Cygwin/XFree86 developers will be given priority.
Harold,
I thought you already had the
10 matches
Mail list logo