xouvert? (was Re: Cygwin/XFree86 - No longer associated with XFree86.org)

2003-10-27 Thread Mitchell Skinner
FWIW, I read the cygwin-xfree mailing list archives from time to time, and I just read the [EMAIL PROTECTED] thread linked from /., and it looks to me like Harold was being pretty reasonable and was getting a terrible response. I followed the [EMAIL PROTECTED] discussion and the xwin.org and xouv

Re: xouvert? (was Re: Cygwin/XFree86 - No longer associated with XFree86.org)

2003-10-27 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Mitch, Mitchell Skinner wrote: FWIW, I read the cygwin-xfree mailing list archives from time to time, and I just read the [EMAIL PROTECTED] thread linked from /., and it looks to me like Harold was being pretty reasonable and was getting a terrible response. Thanks. It was so weird to write what

Re: xouvert? (was Re: Cygwin/XFree86 - No longer associated with XFree86.org)

2003-10-27 Thread David Fraser
Harold L Hunt II wrote: Mitch, Mitchell Skinner wrote: I followed the [EMAIL PROTECTED] discussion and the xwin.org and xouvert.org bits, and at first I wasn't sure if the complainers had a real beef or if the hubbub was the outcome of some bizarre historical politics, but it's becoming clearer