Re: Suggestion to list admins for warning/disclaimer on the web for new subscribers

Should the list really be forwarding new people to pastebin considering it sits behind Cloudflare? Or maybe the list really isn't what it used to be? oshwm. On 04/09/16 18:33, Greg Newby wrote: > Dear Zenaan, Georgi: > > Good suggestions, thanks! I edited the list public HTML b

Re: Cypherpunks Charter

Still trying to figure out if (when i signed up to this list) i came to the house party in the crypto ghetto or Bruce Schneier's dinner party. I know which i'd prefer :) On 6 September 2016 05:15:39 GMT+01:00, "Александр" wrote: >2016-09-05 22:44 GMT+03:00 Razer : > >> > Regardless of what Tim

Re: Cloudflare kills.

Just so long as the CEO of Cloudflare isnt the same guy who worked with the US DoD to set up Projwct Honeypot then we're all good right? oh, right. Cloudflare handles at least 4% of web traffic according to their own marketing, thats pretty useful if you want to create a single place to collate

Re: Free speech - front lines in Australia - [perso...@bernardgaynor.com.au: Update: battle for free speech]

So, free speech is ok so long as it is only used to say yhe things you find acceptable? :D On 8 September 2016 04:09:38 GMT+01:00, Nadine Earnshaw wrote: >freedom of speech does not protect hate speechand that is what 18c >which Bernard supports being removed. >He is free to say >"I wouldn't l

Re: Philosophokiddies

Is it just me or did poking the Censored Tor hornets nest release a very poorly scripted attack of retardedness from low level butthurt CIA apologists :D On 8 September 2016 13:32:14 GMT+01:00, Cypher Piggie wrote: >lets target juan that USA troll. 100 euro now on his lil green troll >head. >

Re: Privacy Activists Launch Database to Track Global Sales of Surveillance Tech

This is incredibly useful as it gives a good list of companies not to work for or co-operate with in any way :) On 05/09/16 13:18, Cecilia Tanaka wrote: > Privacy Activists Launch Database to Track Global Sales of Surveillance > Tech > >

Re: Free speech - front lines in Australia - [perso...@bernardgaynor.com.au: Update: battle for free speech]

access >as of right or by invitation, whether express or implied and whether >or not a charge is made for admission to the place. > >- Original Message - >From: "oshwm" >To:"Nadine Earnshaw" , "CypherPunks" >Cc: >Sent:Thu, 08 Sep 2016 06:1

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent

But didnt you just add to that number :D On 9 September 2016 13:03:09 GMT+01:00, d...@geer.org wrote: >I have stopped reading this list for one reason: the number of >messages. > >Arrivederci

Re: Free speech - front lines in Australia - [perso...@bernardgaynor.com.au: Update: battle for free speech]

sations and be a dick in private with other >dicksthis i think you have the right to.importantly that you have >right to privacy. the right to be free, to talk openly in private >without being monitored by others. >this is what I think freedom of speech is. > >----- Original Me

Re: flexthismotherfucker

The difference is you have the chinese knocking on your front door and are blocking them whereas you are willingly giving the secrets of your browsing across multiple sites to a single organisation whose CEO has links to the US DoD (arguably more damaging and interventionist than the chinese). Y

Re: Free speech - front lines in Australia - [perso...@bernardgaynor.com.au: Update: battle for free speech]

There appear to be a few people being very vocal on this list at the moment with very Pro Statist views. Don't have a problem with that as such, just noticed a sudden upswing since the discussion of the Tor mail list censorship :D I'm sure I'm just being paranoid and the Tor management haven't

Re: flexthismotherfucker

ally opposed to services such as Clouflare, wouldn't you? On 13 September 2016 07:26:26 GMT+01:00, Mirimir wrote: >On 09/13/2016 12:18 AM, oshwm wrote: >> The difference is you have the chinese knocking on your front door >and are blocking them whereas you are willingly giving the

Re: flexthismotherfucker

gt;On 09/13/2016 10:22 AM, Razer wrote: >> >> >> On 09/13/2016 08:53 AM, Mirimir wrote: >>> On 09/13/2016 08:00 AM, Razer wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 09/12/2016 11:26 PM, Mirimir wrote: >>>>> On 09/13/2016 12:18 AM, oshwm

Re: flexthismotherfucker

come in. >> It travels faster than the speed of sound. The first news you get of >it >> is the blast. >> Then, if you’re still around, you hear the sound of it coming in. >> What if it should hit exactly—ahh, no—for a split second you’d have >to feel >> the ver

Re: [MONEY] Hungary first EU nation to ban Rothschild banks / IMF

Trueactivist.com is another site that sits behind Cloudflare - yep, true activist alright !!! On 13 September 2016 18:02:20 GMT+01:00, Zenaan Harkness wrote: >following iceland's example >http://www.trueactivist.com/victory-hungary-becomes-first-european-nation-to-ban-rothschild-banks/ > >Now

Re: UK: Censors, Tracks and Balkanizes Its Internet; 10yrs for Pirates

The UK Gov has spent two generations indoctrinating people right from birth that privacy is only for bad people, big corporations will look after them, gov dependency is a good thing, debt is a good thing, politics is of no interest and too complicated for them etc etc Only subversive types wou

Re: UK: Censors, Tracks and Balkanizes Its Internet; 10yrs for Pirates

as they're told. On 15 September 2016 07:45:31 GMT+01:00, "Stephen D. Williams" wrote: >On 9/14/16 11:11 PM, oshwm wrote: >> The UK Gov has spent two generations indoctrinating people right from >birth that privacy is only for bad people, big corporations >> will

Re: Intercept's Micah Lee Tips Clinton On How To Maintain Corruption and Secrecy

Micah Lee is a cunt who thinks throwing website visitors under the Cloudflare bus is an acceptable thing to do. I personally wouldn't trust him with anything privacy or freedom related. oshwm. On 15 October 2016 04:22:36 GMT+01:00, grarpamp wrote: >This is grand... > >https://th

Re: The difference between moderation and censorship [was Re: Inspirational - Senator Culleton's Passionate...]

I thought spam filtering was generally automated by a machine without an opinion on social issues and moderation was basically the censorship of messages based on the whim of a human? On 15 October 2016 11:41:17 GMT+01:00, "Shawn K. Quinn" wrote: >On Fri, 2016-10-14 at 22:24 -0300, #$%& wrote

Re: [Cryptography] changing crypto policy? Not Deborah Ross

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 18 October 2016 20:14:34 GMT+01:00, juan wrote: >On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 21:54:54 -0400 >John Newman wrote: > >> My god... something cross posted from the crypto list?? >> >> But Juan says that list is MODERATED and only 'nerds' talk >> there

Re: QuarkLabs VeraCrypt Audit Results

On 18 October 2016 22:38:43 GMT+01:00, grarpamp wrote: >https://ostif.org/the-veracrypt-audit-results/ >https://ostif.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/VeraCrypt-Audit-Final-for-Public-Release.pdf >https://ostif.org/ostif-quarklab-and-veracrypt-e-mails-are-being-intercepted/ > >VeraCrypt 1.18 and its

Re: Are there crypto discussions on this forum

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 I believe you are looking for the cryptography list or tor list if you want to only see what a particular individual thinks is acceptable :D On 30 November 2016 10:57:14 GMT+00:00, Eugen Leitl wrote: >On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 09:45:47AM +0100, Tom

Re: Are there crypto discussions on this forum

Nov 30, 2016 at 11:09:45AM +0000, oshwm wrote: > >> I believe you are looking for the cryptography list or tor list if >you want to only see what a particular individual thinks is acceptable >:D > >I'm subscribed to those, and they are actually functional, unlike this >

Re: Are there crypto discussions on this forum

Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:50:49AM +0000, oshwm wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA512 >> >> If you are already part of functional censored lists why would you be >interested in this despicable, dysfunctional, uncensored list? > >That's bec

Re: Are there crypto discussions on this forum

piece of open source hardware appeared based on the RISC V instruction set... https://www.sifive.com/ Feel free to discuss, whiners are invited too :P Cheers, oshwm. On 1 December 2016 18:38:39 GMT+00:00, juan wrote: >On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 11:42:13 + >Eugen Leitl wrote: > >> I

Re: Are there crypto discussions on this forum

On 1 December 2016 20:49:58 GMT+00:00, juan wrote: >On Thu, 01 Dec 2016 20:28:12 +0000 >oshwm wrote: > >> Just to add to the discussion if we're busy justifying our existence >> to the whiners... >> >> A while back there was an active discussion of open sou

Re: Intro/Projects

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 6 December 2016 07:08:44 GMT, Elle Phent wrote: >> Charles Fox: >> I'm not an anarchist > >This isn't anarchist list > >This is christian conservitive pro-russian list > >> please forgive me. > >Only Jebus can forgive you I must be on the wrong

Re: Intro/Projects

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 6 December 2016 14:43:09 GMT, Charles Fox wrote: >I agree Windows would be the weak link, but I think it is easier to >persuade someone to install an add-in than to learn Linux. > > > > >Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email

Re: more cuck for Barack - Judge Jeanine dishes out another serve

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 13 December 2016 22:06:59 GMT, John Newman wrote: > >> On Dec 13, 2016, at 2:49 PM, juan wrote: >>Oh yes. Moderation is not literally "outright censorship". It is >>"outright censorship" with a different name. No doubt the >>change of

Re: Call for Cypherpunks historians

On 5 January 2017 19:26:59 GMT+00:00, MARK GORE wrote: >Maybe Satoshi N is reading list as he released white paper here. _Mg > >Communicator... > >> On Jan 5, 2017, at 12:47, Bruce Fenton wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I'm working on a book about blockchain tech and one chapter covers >some of the

Re: Schneier on Russian Hacking - deconstructed

On 18 January 2017 15:15:51 GMT+00:00, Razer wrote: > > >On 01/17/2017 10:36 PM, Mirimir wrote: >> >> It does seem that he's sold out. First, Tor Project. Now, this. >> >> Sad, indeed :( > >It's a paycheck... > >Also William Arkin, who wrote the rather cutting edge "Early Warning" >('Codenames, Sp

Re: Indiana bill would allow police to shut down protests 'by any means necessary'

On 27 January 2017 07:59:03 GMT+00:00, "James A. Donald" wrote: >On 1/21/2017 11:17 PM, Pinoaffe wrote: >>> "Indiana bill would allow police to shut down protests 'by any means >> necessary'" > >Fake News. > > >> >https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jan/18/indiana-protest-bill-police-power >

Re: Indiana bill would allow police to shut down protests 'by any means necessary'

On 28 January 2017 01:50:31 GMT+00:00, booty wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 27 2017 00:43:51 -0000 >> "oshwm" wrote: >> >> Thats because ur a cunt. > >No, it's because he a libertarian, like the great philosopher Jimothy >Bell No, he's a selfish cunt.

Re: What IS "Fascism"?

On 14 February 2017 18:16:03 GMT+00:00, Razer wrote: > > >On 02/14/2017 10:00 AM, Joshua Case wrote: >> what do you think a ‘cypher’ is, shill? >> > >It was one of Tim May's interests. What do you think PUNKS means, >troll? > >It means you should get lost if you don't like the way this UNMODERATED

Re: Is email really that hard?

On 22 February 2017 08:34:43 GMT+00:00, Eugen Leitl wrote: >On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 01:54:34AM -0500, grarpamp wrote: >> In addition to not putting retarded spaces in links >> which does nothing useful, you can also learn to >> preserve threading on replies, which is actually useful. >> Top postin

Re: Is email really that hard?

On 22 February 2017 17:02:50 GMT+00:00, Cecilia Tanaka wrote: >On Wed, Feb 22, 2017, at 5:51 AM, oshwm wrote: >> >> On 22 February 2017 08:34:43 GMT+00:00, Eugen Leitl >wrote: >> >> >Who is the list owner these days? If we do not get moderation going >

Time to put aside the excuses...

Openfab cometh? https://hackaday.com/2017/02/25/the-fab-lab-next-door-diy-semiconductors/

Re: CONFESS! Programmers Are Confessing Their Coding Sins!

On 2 March 2017 04:22:34 GMT+00:00, "James A. Donald" wrote: >On 3/2/2017 1:00 PM, Razer wrote: >>> A number of programmers have taken it Twitter to bring it to >>> everyone's, but particularly recruiter's, attention about the >grueling >>> interview process in their field that relies heavily on

Re: CONFESS! Programmers Are Confessing Their Coding Sins!

On 2 March 2017 07:22:48 GMT+00:00, "James A. Donald" wrote: >On 3/2/2017 5:11 PM, oshwm wrote: >> I'd take someone with good imagination who has to look up fine > > details over someone who has a photographic memory and no > > imagination any day. > &g

Re: http://systemd-free.org/

On 16 April 2017 02:10:20 BST, juan wrote: > > > I guess we have systemd courtesy of some TLA Try devuan (Debian fork without systemd)... http://devuanzuwu3xoqwp.onion (or devuan.org if not want to use tor)

Re: "All fossil-fuel vehicles will vanish in 8 years..."

ould believe that, in the UK at least, given 5-10 years that EVs will be sold in significant numbers and occupying the place in car sales that diesels currently occupy with total sales dominance over all car sales in about 20 years. Self-Drivers will grow to share a significant amount of market share in that 20 year timescale. Of course, I have no qualifications to back up my guesswork so we'll have to wait 20 years to see if my guesswork beats Ivy League economists guesswork lol. cheers, oshwm.

Re: "All fossil-fuel vehicles will vanish in 8 years..."

On 17 May 2017 22:45:11 BST, juan wrote: >On Wed, 17 May 2017 14:35:53 -0700 >Steven Schear wrote: > >> Quite likely self-driving cars will be a red herring to massively >> chip away at personal liberties. > > > of course. People would be 'free' to move along whatever route > google '

Re: Swedish Prosecutors Have Dropped The Julian Assange Rape Investigation

On 19 May 2017 19:45:06 BST, juan wrote: >On Fri, 19 May 2017 09:23:20 -0300 >Cecilia Tanaka wrote: > >> # >> >https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/19/world/europe/julian-assange-sweden-rape.html >> > > Interesting. Now the nazi swedish government, a bunch of > lackeys/accomplices of the