problems that aren't solvable with today's technology?
Other than protecting keys -- and, of course, DRM -- I'm very far from
convinced of it. The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars but in
ourselves.
--Prof. Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
problems that aren't solvable with today's technology?
Other than protecting keys -- and, of course, DRM -- I'm very far from
convinced of it. The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars but in
ourselves.
--Prof. Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
of Yardley's success with women. I have no idea
if that's true, though moralistic revulsion may be closer. But I
wonder if the root of the personal antagonism may be more that of the
technocrat for the manager...
--Prof. Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
of Yardley's success with women. I have no idea
if that's true, though moralistic revulsion may be closer. But I
wonder if the root of the personal antagonism may be more that of the
technocrat for the manager...
--Prof. Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Simon Josefsson writes:
Of course, everything fails if you ALSO get your DNSSEC root key from
the DHCP server, but in this case you shouldn't expect to be secure.
I wouldn't be surprised if some people suggest pushing the DNSSEC root
key via DHCP though, because
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bill Stewart writes:
Somebody did an interesting attack on a cable network's customers.
They cracked the cable company's DHCP server, got it to provide a
Connection-specific DNS suffic pointing to a machine they owned,
and also told it to use their DNS server.
This
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Matt Crawford writ
es:
The worst trouble I've had with https is that you have no way to use host
header names to differentiate between sites that require different SSL
certificates.
True as written, but Netscrape ind Internet Exploder each have a hack
for honoring
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], R. A. Hettinga wr
ites:
--- begin forwarded text
Status: RO
From: Somebody
To: R. A. Hettinga [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Wiretap Act Does Not Cover Message 'in Storage' For Short Perio
d (was Re: BNA's Internet Law News (ILN) - 2/27/03)
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2003
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], R. A. Hettinga wr
ites:
--- begin forwarded text
Status: RO
From: Somebody
To: R. A. Hettinga [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Wiretap Act Does Not Cover Message 'in Storage' For Short Perio
d (was Re: BNA's Internet Law News (ILN) - 2/27/03)
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2003
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter Gutmann writes
:
[Moderator's note: FYI: no pragma is needed. This is what C's volatile
keyword is for.
No it isn't. This was done to death on vuln-dev, see the list archives for
the discussion.
[Moderator's note: I'd be curious to hear a summary -- it
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], David G. Koontz writes:
Trei, Peter wrote:
- start quote -
Cyber Security Plan Contemplates U.S. Data Retention Law
http://online.securityfocus.com/news/486
Internet service providers may be forced into wholesale spying
on their customers as part of the
11 matches
Mail list logo
