Re: Entertaining Entrapment Email Effort

2002-06-09 Thread Morlock Elloi
> Vitas - I hope you're enjoying your stay at the Millenium & Copthorne Hotels, > where you're using the internet service. It's depressing how IQ of TLA personnel is inversely proportional to the amount of money pumped into them. TLAE (TLA effectiveness) seems to be a universal constant. =

Re: PKI: Only Mostly Dead

2002-06-09 Thread Morlock Elloi
> > >It's clearly not your shoe size in kilo-angstroms, unless you have MIGHTY > > >large feet. According to 'units', that works out to 4860 inches. > > > > Obviously it's my hat size then. > > I always knew you had a fat head ;) The real point here that 100% context-free situations are very

Entertaining Entrapment Email Effort

2002-06-09 Thread Bill Stewart
Vitas - I hope you're enjoying your stay at the Millenium & Copthorne Hotels, where you're using the internet service. You can find all the cracking tools you need for Jane's at 128.11.100.130 and 167.216.248.42. >Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >X-Originating-IP: [195.224.80.50] >From: "cristi

Re: PKI: Only Mostly Dead

2002-06-09 Thread Peter Gutmann
Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Gutmann) writes: >> For example the value >>1234567890 taken in isolation could be anything from my ICQ number >>to my shoe size in kilo-angstroms, but if you view it as the pair { >>, } then it makes sense >>(disclaimer: I have no id

Re: PKI: Only Mostly Dead

2002-06-09 Thread Derek Atkins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Gutmann) writes: > >It's clearly not your shoe size in kilo-angstroms, unless you have MIGHTY > >large feet. According to 'units', that works out to 4860 inches. > > Obviously it's my hat size then. I always knew you had a fat head ;) > Peter. -derek -- Dere

Re: PKI: Only Mostly Dead

2002-06-09 Thread Derek Atkins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Gutmann) writes: > For example the value > 1234567890 taken in isolation could be anything from my ICQ number > to my shoe size in kilo-angstroms, but if you view it as the pair { > , } then it makes sense > (disclaimer: I have no idea whether that's either a valid I