On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 10:33:39AM -0700, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
> Thanks for the distinction, however it still makes CC folks slaves of
> the
> State. Suppose Joe Badcredit finds a blank application and applies?
> The State then uses violence to coerce the CC into non-consensual
> transaction
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 01:32:43AM -0500, An Metet wrote:
> >From http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/55/36485.html :
>
> "To download the online picture, he used the Anonymizer.com service,
> believing the companys privacy policy would protect him. Not so. Dutch
The article got it wrong. He u
and transmission of known-hosts entries has been standard
operating procedure everywhere *I* have used ssh for the past 10 years.
I thought everyone did that.
regards,
petard
ould filter
AV replies/complaints from the remailers, but there's no way to stop the
automoton/spamee from directing it to the virus "sender"/upstream
provider directly.
Perhaps people who run AV systems which send out automated notifications
deserve any unwanted attention they might get this way.
regards,
petard
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 09:47:07AM -0800, Major Variola (ret.) wrote:
> ...public health officials are considering legal action to force AOL and
> certain websites to warn members about...
>
> http://wired.com/news/medtech/0,1286,62005,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_2
>
> Compelled speech is prohibited, s
e did not see it as critical enough to throw out
security alerts and make a new release right then, so anyone with
untrusted local users was completely unprotected. Including Debian,
apparently.
Regards,
petard
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 06:58:58PM -0800, James A. Donald wrote:
> --
> I want fully deniable information storage -- information
> theoretic deniable, not merely steganographic deniable, for
> stenography can never be wholly secure.
>
> So I would have a fixed sized block of data containi
he Oxford 922 bridge chipset? This is the closest product
I am aware of:
http://www.apple.com/ipod/
It's firewire 400 and most assuredly does not use a 922 chip.
If software companies were responsible for bugs in hardware that they do not
manufacture, MS would be in much more trouble than it is already.
petard