Changing LIST (again)

2013-05-01 Thread Bron Gondwana
One of my release goals for Cyrus 2.5 is to be correct in our implementation of every standard that we claim to support. This is why I emailed the list last week asking if anyone is using the intermediate SPECIALUSE representation in git. Since there was no reply, I'm assuming it will be OK :) I

Re: Changing LIST (again)

2013-05-01 Thread Robert Mueller
> Alt External Non-Alt External Internal > Inbox INBOX user.foo > Inbox.sub INBOX.Inbox.subuser.foo.Inbox.sub > INBOX.sub INBOX.INBOX.subuser.foo.INBOX.sub > INBOX.INBOXuser.foo.INBOX > INBO

Re: Changing LIST (again)

2013-05-02 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Thu, May 2, 2013, at 04:05 PM, Robert Mueller wrote: > A couple of things: > > 1. Should we block creation of INBOX.sub in the alt namespace mode? In > theory, only the top level "[Ii][Nn][Bb][Oo][Xx]" is special, but it > *might* confuse some clients that INBOX.sub and Inbox.sub are different

Re: Changing LIST (again)

2013-05-19 Thread Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems)
On 2013-05-02 07:29, Bron Gondwana wrote: One of my release goals for Cyrus 2.5 is to be correct in our implementation of every standard that we claim to support. This is why I emailed the list last week asking if anyone is using the intermediate SPECIALUSE representation in git. Since there wa

Re: Changing LIST (again)

2013-05-19 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Sun, May 19, 2013, at 08:36 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote: > On 2013-05-02 07:29, Bron Gondwana wrote: > > One of my release goals for Cyrus 2.5 is to be correct in our > > implementation of every standard that we claim to support. > > > > This is why I emailed the list last week

Re: Changing LIST (again)

2013-05-19 Thread Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems)
On 2013-05-19 15:07, Bron Gondwana wrote: On Sun, May 19, 2013, at 08:36 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote: Should you make the change to allow sub-folders (of the INBOX) to in fact be created (while using altnamespace), would that eliminate the use of \NoInferiors? Indeed it woul

Re: Changing LIST (again)

2013-05-19 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Sun, May 19, 2013, at 11:21 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote: > On 2013-05-19 15:07, Bron Gondwana wrote: > > On Sun, May 19, 2013, at 08:36 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) > > wrote: > >> Should you make the change to allow sub-folders (of the INBOX) to in > >> fact be creat

Re: Changing LIST (again)

2013-05-19 Thread Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems)
On 2013-05-19 21:45, Bron Gondwana wrote: On Sun, May 19, 2013, at 11:21 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote: On 2013-05-19 15:07, Bron Gondwana wrote: > On Sun, May 19, 2013, at 08:36 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) > wrote: >> Should you make the change to allow sub-folders (of