Troy Kisky writes:
> Reserve channels 0,1,12,13 and
> slots 78-109 for dsp use on dm644x.
>
> Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky
>
> I've only verified that channels 0, and 78-101 need
> reserved, but reserving a little extra seems like
> a good idea.
I'm not crazy about this hard-coded reservation.
Th
ource-boun...@linux.davincidsp.com
> ] On Behalf Of Kevin Hilman
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 5:02 AM
> To: Troy Kisky
> Cc: davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: DaVinci: edma: reserve dsp dma usage
>
> Troy Kisky writes:
>
> >
Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Troy Kisky writes:
>
>> Reserve channels 0,1,12,13 and
>> slots 78-109 for dsp use on dm644x.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky
>>
>> I've only verified that channels 0, and 78-101 need
>> reserved, but reserving a little extra seems like
>> a good idea.
>
> I'm not crazy ab
al Message-
>> From: davinci-linux-open-source-boun...@linux.davincidsp.com
>> [mailto:davinci-linux-open-source-boun...@linux.davincidsp.com
>> ] On Behalf Of Kevin Hilman
>> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 5:02 AM
>> To: Troy Kisky
>> Cc: davinci-linux-open-sou
..@boundarydevices.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 3:17 PM
> To: Ring, Chris
> Cc: Kevin Hilman; davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: DaVinci: edma: reserve dsp dma usage
>
> Ring, Chris wrote:
> > It's a bit too much info, but
Ring, Chris wrote:
> It may not have been clear, there's sort of a 2 phase resource management:
>1. At build/config time where the resources are statically partitioned -
> some for ARM, some for DSP - and given to their respective CPU-specific
> resource managers. I think originally we simp
I'm personally not at all against the
idea.
Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: Troy Kisky [mailto:troy.ki...@boundarydevices.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 4:15 PM
> To: Ring, Chris
> Cc: Kevin Hilman; davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com
> Subjec
Ring, Chris wrote:
> Why does this patch get your mpeg4 codec to work - b/c the codec has a
> hard-coded channel 0 it needs
> (so your patch keeps channel 0 out of Linux's partition)?
Yes. And channels 78-101 as well.
>
> If so, IMHO, that change doesn't belong in the mainline tree - that's a
