Re: [PATCH] V4L: adding digital video timings APIs

2009-10-21 Thread Hans Verkuil
Hi Murali, > From: Muralidharan Karicheri > > This is the initial version of the digital video timings APIs > implementation. > > This adds the above APIs to the v4l2 core. This is based on version v1.2 > of the RFC titled "V4L - Support for video timings at the input/output > interface" > Follow

RE: [PATCH] V4L: adding digital video timings APIs

2009-10-23 Thread Karicheri, Muralidharan
Hans, >> following IOCTLS :- >> >> - verify the new v4l2_input capabilities flag added >> - Enumerate available presets using VIDIOC_ENUM_DV_PRESETS >> - Set one of the supported preset using VIDIOC_S_DV_PRESET >> - Get current preset using VIDIOC_G_DV_PRESET >> - Detect current preset u

Re: [PATCH] V4L: adding digital video timings APIs

2009-11-10 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Thursday 05 November 2009 13:56:29 Hans Verkuil wrote: > On Friday 23 October 2009 22:44:34 Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote: > > Hans, > > > > >> following IOCTLS :- > > >> > > >> - verify the new v4l2_input capabilities flag added > > >> - Enumerate available presets using VIDIOC_ENUM_DV_PRE

RE: [PATCH] V4L: adding digital video timings APIs

2009-11-11 Thread Karicheri, Muralidharan
Hans, >> [MK] Could you explain this to me? In my prototype, I had tvp5146 that >> implements S_STD and tvp7002 that implements S_PRESET. Since bridge >driver >> has all the knowledge about the sub devices and their capabilities, it >can >> set the flag for each of the input that it supports (curr

RE: [PATCH] V4L: adding digital video timings APIs

2009-11-11 Thread Karicheri, Muralidharan
inux-open- >sou...@linux.davincidsp.com >Subject: Re: [PATCH] V4L: adding digital video timings APIs > >On Thursday 05 November 2009 13:56:29 Hans Verkuil wrote: >> On Friday 23 October 2009 22:44:34 Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote: >> > Hans, >> > >> &g

Re: [PATCH] V4L: adding digital video timings APIs

2009-11-11 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Wednesday 11 November 2009 22:45:15 Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote: > Hans, > > >> [MK] Could you explain this to me? In my prototype, I had tvp5146 that > >> implements S_STD and tvp7002 that implements S_PRESET. Since bridge > >driver > >> has all the knowledge about the sub devices and their

RE: [PATCH] V4L: adding digital video timings APIs

2009-11-12 Thread Karicheri, Muralidharan
> >Actually, the bridge driver only needs to override if it has multiple >inputs >where the capability flags differ (i.e. some inputs only support S_STD and >others only support S_DV_PRESET). > >In all other cases the core will fill it in correctly. > >Doing it in the core ensures that the capabili

RE: [PATCH] V4L: adding digital video timings APIs

2009-11-13 Thread Karicheri, Muralidharan
inux-open- >sou...@linux.davincidsp.com >Subject: Re: [PATCH] V4L: adding digital video timings APIs > >On Thursday 05 November 2009 13:56:29 Hans Verkuil wrote: >> On Friday 23 October 2009 22:44:34 Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote: >> > Hans, >> > >> > >> following IO

RE: [PATCH] V4L: adding digital video timings APIs

2009-11-16 Thread Karicheri, Muralidharan
Hans, >Hi Murali, > >What is the status of this? It would be great if we can get this in for >2.6.33. > I am working on the documentation today and then the application. I think a new patch will be ready by tomorrow. I am not sure if there is a better way to add documentation.. Currently I have

Re: [PATCH] V4L: adding digital video timings APIs

2009-11-16 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Monday 16 November 2009 19:35:40 Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote: > > Hans, > > >Hi Murali, > > > >What is the status of this? It would be great if we can get this in for > >2.6.33. > > > > I am working on the documentation today and then the application. I think a > new patch will be ready by