To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51380
--- Additional comments from spri...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 13 13:54:46
+ 2009 ---
Appendum to my perivious comment:
This is reported for Ooo Base 3.1.
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51380
--- Additional comments from spri...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 13 13:53:24
+ 2009 ---
Reported
This workaround works is fine without any parameters, but it does n
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103682
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103371
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 13 11:21:08 +
2009 ---
Exactly, I have meant the implementations like the one in writer. I am not aware
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103763
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103763
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 13 10:41:50 +
2009 ---
okay, looks good, works fine - I'll commit this to CWS dba32f, thanks.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103371
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 13 10:40:49 +
2009 ---
Grokking for SFX_EVENT_PREPARECLOSEDOC gives one occurrence, namely
SwXAutoTextE
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103763
--- Additional comments from cl...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 13 10:36:53 +
2009 ---
removed sh -c because that is redundant (already in tg_ext.mk)
(and the mac pa
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103371
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 13 10:33:35 +
2009 ---
> We should only be sure that the applications do not do unnecessary actions
> i
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103371
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 13 10:07:58 +
2009 ---
I must confess I am also quite confused by events names now.
Anyway I have noth
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102819
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 13 09:57:50 +
2009 ---
uhm, this comment was intended for another issue, sorry.
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102819
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 13 09:57:16 +
2009 ---
strange enough, there's no code at all to care for the "Insert Control" item -
s
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103371
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 13 09:47:11 +
2009 ---
Some terminology, as this is something which confused and mislead me, too:
"Doc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103371
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 13 09:21:17 +
2009 ---
Argh! The "Document closing" event does not work for "ordinary" text documents,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103371
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98242
User mh changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96896
User mh changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103763
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 13 08:02:32 +
2009 ---
Okay, the second patch does not really fit to the original topic of the issue,
b
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103266
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 13 07:44:40 +
2009 ---
As we have discussed with Marc, the issue stays in dba32f.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104193
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103938
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103266
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 13 07:19:25 +
2009 ---
Thank you. I would suggest then to use fwk115. It was planned as StarOffice only
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103266
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 13 07:08:52 +
2009 ---
Yes , I agree. I will add the isssue to the CWS.
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103266
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 13 07:00:34 +
2009 ---
We don't have a plan for such a CWS. If you want, and Marc agrees, you could
hij
24 matches
Mail list logo
