Re: mo prefix request

2011-08-11 Thread H.Merijn Brand
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 21:53:36 +0200, "Steffen Winkler" wrote: > Thank you, but there is mistake in trunk/DBI.pm > >,--- should be a "m" > v > 330: po_ => { class => 'DBD::MO', }, > 342: po_ => { class => 'DBD::PO', }, Oh my! yank-put fail

about prefix requests

2011-08-11 Thread Darren Duncan
Is it necessary for each DBI driver to have a prefix registered in DBI itself, or is this only necessary when the driver wishes to expose extra public methods? If the DBD doesn't expose custom methods, can it be used without the prefix registration? -- Darren Duncan

Re: mo prefix request

2011-08-11 Thread Steffen Winkler
Thank you, but there is mistake in trunk/DBI.pm ,--- should be a "m" v 330: po_ => { class => 'DBD::MO', }, 342: po_ => { class => 'DBD::PO', }, The change report in "Changes" is ok. --Steffen Original-Nachricht > Datum:

Re: mo prefix request

2011-08-11 Thread H.Merijn Brand
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 07:28:00 +0200, "Steffen Winkler" wrote: > Hallo together, > > that is a good idea to register a prefix. > To ask is better than me during creating DBD::PO and the picked 'po_'. > I apologize for. > > I ask now for register 'mo_' for DBD::MO. > That is my plan with some work