Re: perl pad.c Assertion !((sv)->sv_flags & 0x00010000) failed

2007-06-25 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Moin, On Monday 25 June 2007 23:31:25 Nicholas Clark wrote: > On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 09:44:02PM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote: > > Once upon a time there was talk of implementing a "less" pragma > > so you'd be able to say something like > > > > use les

Re: perl pad.c Assertion !((sv)->sv_flags & 0x00010000) failed

2007-06-25 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 09:44:02PM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote: > Once upon a time there was talk of implementing a "less" pragma > so you'd be able to say something like > > use less qw(memory); > > to indicate that cpu/memory balance should be shifted towards cpu. > Pity that never happened. I

Re: perl pad.c Assertion !((sv)->sv_flags & 0x00010000) failed

2007-06-25 Thread Tim Bunce
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 10:31:25PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: > On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 09:44:02PM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote: > > > Once upon a time there was talk of implementing a "less" pragma > > so you'd be able to say something like > > > > use less qw(memory); > > > > to indicate that

Re: perl pad.c Assertion !((sv)->sv_flags & 0x00010000) failed

2007-06-25 Thread Tim Bunce
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 02:31:07PM +0200, demerphq wrote: > On 6/22/07, Peter Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 22:33:03 +0100, Tim Bunce wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 06:47:11PM +0200, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote: > >>> On 21/06/07, Steve Hay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

RE: perl pad.c Assertion !((sv)->sv_flags & 0x00010000) failed

2007-06-22 Thread Gaul, Ken
>From: Peter Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 22 June 2007 13:25 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; dbi-users@perl.org >Subject: Re: perl pad.c Assertion !((sv)->sv_flags & 0x0001) failed > >On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 22:33:03 +0100, Tim Bunce wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 21, 2

Re: perl pad.c Assertion !((sv)->sv_flags & 0x00010000) failed

2007-06-22 Thread demerphq
On 6/22/07, Peter Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 22:33:03 +0100, Tim Bunce wrote: > On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 06:47:11PM +0200, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote: >> On 21/06/07, Steve Hay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >I remember lots of discussion a while ago about constructions li

Re: perl pad.c Assertion !((sv)->sv_flags & 0x00010000) failed

2007-06-22 Thread Peter Scott
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 22:33:03 +0100, Tim Bunce wrote: > On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 06:47:11PM +0200, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote: >> On 21/06/07, Steve Hay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >I remember lots of discussion a while ago about constructions like "my >> >$x = 1 if $y;". I don't remember what the

Re: perl pad.c Assertion !((sv)->sv_flags & 0x00010000) failed

2007-06-21 Thread Rafael Garcia-Suarez
On 21/06/07, Steve Hay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: With the attached patch I now have all tests successful. I remember lots of discussion a while ago about constructions like "my $x = 1 if $y;". I don't remember what the conclusion of it all was, except that it's probably best avoided. Is that ri

Re: perl pad.c Assertion !((sv)->sv_flags & 0x00010000) failed

2007-06-21 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Moin, On Thursday 21 June 2007 18:59:31 Steve Hay wrote: > Tels wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Yes. But you patch just removes the "my" > > No it doesn't. Look again. Just ignore me *goes and grabs coffee* ... Tels - -- Signed

Re: perl pad.c Assertion !((sv)->sv_flags & 0x00010000) failed

2007-06-21 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Moin, On Thursday 21 June 2007 18:44:22 Steve Hay wrote: > Tim Bunce wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 08:47:53AM +0100, Steve Hay wrote: > >> Tim Bunce wrote: > >>> file: $CPAN/authors/id/T/TI/TIMB/DBI-1.57.tar.gz > >>> size: 490304 bytes > >>>

Re: perl pad.c Assertion !((sv)->sv_flags & 0x00010000) failed

2007-06-21 Thread Tim Bunce
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 05:44:22PM +0100, Steve Hay wrote: > Tim Bunce wrote: > > > >Not sure when I'll be able to dig deeper. CC'd to perl5-porters in the > >hope they can help narrow it down. > > With the attached patch I now have all tests successful. Applied. Thanks Steve! Tim.

Re: perl pad.c Assertion !((sv)->sv_flags & 0x00010000) failed

2007-06-21 Thread Tim Bunce
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 06:47:11PM +0200, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote: > On 21/06/07, Steve Hay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >With the attached patch I now have all tests successful. > > > >I remember lots of discussion a while ago about constructions like "my > >$x = 1 if $y;". I don't remember wha

Re: perl pad.c Assertion !((sv)->sv_flags & 0x00010000) failed

2007-06-21 Thread Steve Hay
Tels wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Moin, On Thursday 21 June 2007 18:44:22 Steve Hay wrote: Tim Bunce wrote: On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 08:47:53AM +0100, Steve Hay wrote: Tim Bunce wrote: file: $CPAN/authors/id/T/TI/TIMB/DBI-1.57.tar.gz size: 490304 bytes md5: fca667

Re: perl pad.c Assertion !((sv)->sv_flags & 0x00010000) failed

2007-06-21 Thread Steve Hay
Tim Bunce wrote: On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 08:47:53AM +0100, Steve Hay wrote: Tim Bunce wrote: file: $CPAN/authors/id/T/TI/TIMB/DBI-1.57.tar.gz size: 490304 bytes md5: fca667f59dff24058a8e0e8f09e2aad9 =head2 Changes in DBI 1.57 (svn rev 9639), 13th June 2007 Fixed t/86gofer_fail tests to

perl pad.c Assertion !((sv)->sv_flags & 0x00010000) failed (was: ANNOUNCE: DBI 1.57)

2007-06-20 Thread Tim Bunce
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 08:47:53AM +0100, Steve Hay wrote: > Tim Bunce wrote: > > file: $CPAN/authors/id/T/TI/TIMB/DBI-1.57.tar.gz > > size: 490304 bytes > > md5: fca667f59dff24058a8e0e8f09e2aad9 > > > >=head2 Changes in DBI 1.57 (svn rev 9639), 13th June 2007 > > > > Fixed t/86gofer_fail tes