Sven Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Or in other words: With a 64bit (amd64) kernel, where are the actual
> limits for:
> 32bit Apps
~4 GiB
> 64bit Apps
17179869184 GiB theoretically
~262144 GiB on current CPUs (- a few GiB the kernel reserves)
>
> Thanks,
> Sven
MfG
Goswin
-
Sebastian Kügler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sunday 06 February 2005 00:29, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Sebastian Kügler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > These are exactly identical files, hence the error from linking to either
>> > one is the same.
>> >
>> > miro.sebas(~): md5sum /usr/X11
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005, Jonathan Marchand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'am running an amd64 laptop and I would like to build a kernel with
> gcc-.34 like the kernel images avaible on the internet. Therefore, it
> seems I can only build kernel with gcc-3.3. I did change some
> variables in the kernel-source's Ma
I guess other people might be interested in this too.
Kurt
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 01:24:26AM +0100, Sven Mueller wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx wrote on 03/02/2005 18:24:
> >
> >Actually, you can use 4GB of address space for userspace.
>
> For 32bit userspace or also for 64bit user
The Gigabyte GA-K8VNXP has a VIA rhine LAN adapter as well as the r8169
shown in the table (2 ports).
Also it has via82xx audio that isn't shown in the table.
--
Shawn D'Alimonte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E
Kurt Roeckx wrote on 03/02/2005 18:24:
>> On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 05:54:35PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>>
>
>From what I heart you won't feel the difference. The advantage of a
64bit kernel lies in having more than 3GB address space (more than 4GB
for 64bit) programs and the po
Actually, I got it figured out, you were right
those messages are normal. Apparently, changing the S20xprint to
non-executable causes XFree86 to bomb without an error in XFree86.0.log or
syslog... it drops an error into .xsession-errors. I didn't want a print
server running so I took off t
On Saturday 05 February 2005 13:52, Jonathan Marchand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'am running an amd64 laptop and I would like to build a kernel with
> gcc-.34 like the kernel images avaible on the internet. Therefore, it
> seems I can only build kernel with gcc-3.3. I did change some
> variables in the ker
On Sunday 06 February 2005 00:29, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Sebastian Kügler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > These are exactly identical files, hence the error from linking to either
> > one is the same.
> >
> > miro.sebas(~): md5sum /usr/X11R6/lib/libxf86config*.a
> > 27db885b4c292588c6c55ae95
Sebastian Kügler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> These are exactly identical files, hence the error from linking to either one
> is the same.
>
> miro.sebas(~): md5sum /usr/X11R6/lib/libxf86config*.a
> 27db885b4c292588c6c55ae951c85132 /usr/X11R6/lib/libxf86config.a
> 27db885b4c292588c6c55ae951c851
On Saturday 05 February 2005 23:03, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Sebastian Kügler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wednesday 02 February 2005 21:22, Simon Edwards wrote:
> >> It appears that libxf86config.a can't be used by shared libraries. It
> >> doesn't appear to have been compiled correctly
Sebastian Kügler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wednesday 02 February 2005 21:22, Simon Edwards wrote:
>> It appears that libxf86config.a can't be used by shared libraries. It
>> doesn't appear to have been compiled correctly using the -fPIC compile
>> option.
>>
>> I'm currently developing a ut
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 21:22, Simon Edwards wrote:
> It appears that libxf86config.a can't be used by shared libraries. It
> doesn't appear to have been compiled correctly using the -fPIC compile
> option.
>
> I'm currently developing a util in Python that uses has a C extension which
> uses
Jonathan Marchand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I'am running an amd64 laptop and I would like to build a kernel with
> gcc-.34 like the kernel images avaible on the internet. Therefore, it
> seems I can only build kernel with gcc-3.3. I did change some
> variables in the kernel-source's Ma
Hi,
I'am running an amd64 laptop and I would like to build a kernel with
gcc-.34 like the kernel images avaible on the internet. Therefore, it
seems I can only build kernel with gcc-3.3. I did change some
variables in the kernel-source's Makefile and the environment
variables, but the resulting ke
Unfortunately this doesn't seem to make any difference. Are the kernel
options (root, real_root) unchanged in this version?
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 17:20:54 +, Gordon Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 17:01:30 +0100, Filippo Carone
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Gordon Ball
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 17:01:30 +0100, Filippo Carone
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Gordon Ball ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ha scritto:
> > Having until recently been using the stock 2.6.8-1-amd64-k8 kernel
> > (without problems), I decided to try and compile a new one myself.
> >
> > Using the package for ke
On Friday 04 February 2005 23:23, SpikeyGG wrote:
> I tried what you suggested about making the symbolic link and it appears to
> have half-way worked. Now when I kick off X it shows me the Nvidia logo
> for a little while but then jumps back out (without reporting any errors to
> standard output)
* Gordon Ball ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ha scritto:
> Having until recently been using the stock 2.6.8-1-amd64-k8 kernel
> (without problems), I decided to try and compile a new one myself.
>
> Using the package for kernel-source-2.6.10 I compiled a monolithic
> kernel with (I think) everything essentia
Having until recently been using the stock 2.6.8-1-amd64-k8 kernel
(without problems), I decided to try and compile a new one myself.
Using the package for kernel-source-2.6.10 I compiled a monolithic
kernel with (I think) everything essential for boot compiled into the
kernel.
In this configurat
On Saturday 05 February 2005 07:23, SpikeyGG wrote:
> Theodore,
>
> I tried what you suggested about making the symbolic link and it appears to
> have half-way worked. Now when I kick off X it shows me the Nvidia logo
> for a little while but then jumps back out (without reporting any errors to
>
Package: grub
Version: 0.95+cvs20040624-12
Severity: important
When using Linux 2.6.10, grub's 'install' command segfaults on new
hardware that has the NX bit available (e.g. AMD64, and I think also new
Pentium 4 systems). This turns out to be because:
* grub's Unix shell allocates a region of
22 matches
Mail list logo
