Javier Kohen wrote:
El mar, 05-04-2005 a las 21:54 +0200, Niklas Ögren escribió:
I've heard rumour about Linux not able to support ati chipsets that much..
Is that a generic, or a pure64 problem?
Anybody been running pure64 (or x86 debian) on ATI RADEON® XPRESS 200P
chipset?
Been using my R
Niklas Ögren wrote:
I've heard rumour about Linux not able to support ati chipsets that
much.. Is that a generic, or a pure64 problem?
Anybody been running pure64 (or x86 debian) on ATI RADEON® XPRESS 200P
chipset?
I have the non-P version on an MSI board. User experience is _POOR_.
* Clock is
Dear list members,
yesterday I installed a i386 chroot on my 64 bit system, according to
the AMD64 Howto. But now I want to start my Openoffice - and well it
starts, but without Menus. To me it seems, that there are some Libraries
missing. Can somebody tell me what to do that the Menus are here
I've heard rumour about Linux not able to support ati chipsets that much..
Is that a generic, or a pure64 problem?
Anybody been running pure64 (or x86 debian) on ATI RADEON® XPRESS 200P
chipset?
Been using my Radeon 9600 Mobility with free and official ATI drivers
for a year or so. The XFree86 4.3
Paul Reilly wrote:
Is anyone using debian 64 on a Tyan Tiger K8S (S2850G2NR) ?
Are there any issues with running debian on this board?
Looking at the specs it appears everything should be ok
but I'd like to hear first hand from anyone who uses it.
I'm just about to buy one of these with an Opteron
I have not been able to get mythfrontend (running on the same machine as the
backend) to work. The application screen goes blank as soon as I attempt to
watch live TV. I found the following threads that seem to apply:
http://pvrguide.no-ip.com/bbs-old/viewtopic.php?t=19769
http://lists.debian.org/
I have a (working) 32-bit install on a seperate partition. If I
chroot to it and try running
X programs, they work. (After mount -o bind /tmp/.X11-unix
/chroot/tmp/.X11-unix)
mozilla and firefox, however, do not. This is somewhat of a problem
for me since clients ask
me to work on their website
On Monday 04 April 2005 3:16pm, Javier Kohen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been using the /gcc-3.4 archive from Alioth. Is there any
> difference among that one, debian-gcc-3.4 and debian-pure64-3.4? I mean
> a user-noticeable difference, I've read archive-structure and I think I
> understand, but gcc-3.4
Is anyone using debian 64 on a Tyan Tiger K8S (S2850G2NR) ?
Are there any issues with running debian on this board?
Looking at the specs it appears everything should be ok
but I'd like to hear first hand from anyone who uses it.
I'm just about to buy one of these with an Opteron 242.
Thanks,
Pa
I decided to give pure64 a second try after the problems I've been
having with the Epiphany Browser on the gcc-4.0 archive. I don't mind
running Tomcat 4 and whatnot in the chroot jail, but I couldn't find
libesd0-alsa either in the package listing nor in the failed, dep-wait
and not-for-us text fi
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
My problem is when I install the nvidia-glx driver (and hence
nvidia-kernel-source) and compiler it, X seems to start, but simply
turns off the monitor (bad signal sent to screen so it turns off).
Switching to the text console works fine. I can start and stop X just
fine, b
sounds about right to me.
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 16:56 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 04:46:36PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > Hmm, I tried a different monitor, and things just work. I sure feel
> > silly now. And this right after I reinstalled Debian 5 times yester
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 04:46:36PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> Hmm, I tried a different monitor, and things just work. I sure feel
> silly now. And this right after I reinstalled Debian 5 times yesterday
> before discovering that the boot order was not set to CD, HD as I was
> sure I did, bu
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 01:17:02PM -0700, Jacob Bresciani wrote:
> I seem to remember a problem where nvidia didnt put the glx driver in
> the right place and a softlink needed to be inserted to fix it. But that
> involved one of either /usr/X11R6/lib64/modules/extensions/libglx.so
> or /usr/X11R6/
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 01:29:09PM -0700, Zachary Rizer wrote:
> I had a similar issue -- have you made sure that
> /usr/lib64 is a symlink to /usr/lib and *not* a
> directory?
Well I didn't create it, something on the system did, and yes it is a
symlink.
Len Sorensen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 01:17:02PM -0700, Jacob Bresciani wrote:
> I seem to remember a problem where nvidia didnt put the glx driver in
> the right place and a softlink needed to be inserted to fix it. But that
> involved one of either /usr/X11R6/lib64/modules/extensions/libglx.so
> or /usr/X11R6/
I had a similar issue -- have you made sure that
/usr/lib64 is a symlink to /usr/lib and *not* a
directory?
Zaq Rizer
--- Jacob Bresciani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I seem to remember a problem where nvidia didnt put
> the glx driver in
> the right place and a softlink needed to be inserted
>
I seem to remember a problem where nvidia didnt put the glx driver in
the right place and a softlink needed to be inserted to fix it. But that
involved one of either /usr/X11R6/lib64/modules/extensions/libglx.so
or /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libglx.so not existing (can't
remember which) and
El mar, 05-04-2005 a las 21:54 +0200, Niklas Ãgren escribiÃ:
> I've heard rumour about Linux not able to support ati chipsets that much..
> Is that a generic, or a pure64 problem?
>
> Anybody been running pure64 (or x86 debian) on ATI RADEONÂ XPRESS 200P
> chipset?
Been using my Radeon 9600 Mo
I've heard rumour about Linux not able to support ati chipsets that much..
Is that a generic, or a pure64 problem?
Anybody been running pure64 (or x86 debian) on ATI RADEON® XPRESS 200P
chipset?
/n
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 11:58:43AM -0700, Jacob Bresciani wrote:
> don't supposed you could cut and paste the X-Log into here so I can have
> a look?
>
> I'm currently using the same setup (just drop the -deluxe from the
> motherboard, and a standard IDE disk) although I compiled my own kernel
> a
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 12:49:32AM +0530, Bhushan Kulkarni wrote:
> Hello List ,
>i have sis5513 ide controller , when i try to enable DMA for my
> Harddisk , cdrom,
> i get following message -->
>
> # hdparm -d1 /dev/hda
> /dev/hda:
> setting using_dma to 1 (on)
> HDIO_SET_DMA failed: O
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 02:25:39PM -0500, Bill wrote:
> I am running Debian sid (i386, though I am posting here because I am
> using an Asus A8V motherboard, Athlon64 3500+), I can't seem to make
> acpi suspend to ram work, when I suspend the system (kernel 2.6.11.6),
> everything seems to work,
Hi,
I am running Debian sid (i386, though I am posting here because I am
using an Asus A8V motherboard, Athlon64 3500+), I can't seem to make
acpi suspend to ram work, when I suspend the system (kernel 2.6.11.6),
everything seems to work, when I bring it back from sleepingI hear the
system turn
Hello List ,
i have sis5513 ide controller , when i try to enable DMA for my
Harddisk , cdrom,
i get following message -->
# hdparm -d1 /dev/hda
/dev/hda:
setting using_dma to 1 (on)
HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation not permitted
using_dma= 0 (off)
I am running "2.6.11-9-amd64-k8" k
don't supposed you could cut and paste the X-Log into here so I can have
a look?
I'm currently using the same setup (just drop the -deluxe from the
motherboard, and a standard IDE disk) although I compiled my own kernel
and used the NVIDIA driver from www.nvidia.com. Every thing works here.
I am
I installed Debian on our new server (I wanted to see how the 64bit
version is doing and it counts as burnin test to me), and so far
everything pretty much just worked.
System is:
Asus A8V-Deluxe
2 * 512MB Kingston RAM (PC3200 CL3)
A64 3500+ (939pin)
PX716A ATAPI DVD writer
2 * WD2500JD SATA 250GB
> Well, optimize your results you could apply the Low-Latency-Patches and
> enable preemption, this should give the best possible result for the
> standard kernel with your application.
I may give that a go!
Many thanks,
James
___
Sent Using: Total Carnage WebMail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oliver,
That does clear things up a bit, even if it is quite a bit to take in...
Previous to applying the realtime-lsm patches, audio recording/playback with
multi-track hard disk recorders such as Ardour was very laggy and the audio
skipped with more than 3 or so tracks.
29 matches
Mail list logo