On (07/04/05 21:53), Antti Pyykko wrote:
On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Tobias Krais wrote:
But now I want to start my Openoffice - and well it starts, but
without Menus.
Strange. I have the very same problem now. I have OpenOffice.org
installed with the necessary ia32 libs, and it has worked fine
hi
I've downloaded jre from blackdown, in order to use it for as the java
plugin for firefox (as I saw some time ago in this list).
it's all fine but the plugin isn't shown in about:plugins
I had a look at the link I made and I got this:
$ ldd libjavaplugin_oji.so
libjvm.so = not found
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 02:11:42PM +0200, Lorenzo Milesi wrote:
$ ldd libjavaplugin_oji.so
libjvm.so = not found
libverify.so = not found
libnsl.so.1 = /lib/libnsl.so.1 (0x2abee000)
libdl.so.2 = /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x2ad04000)
libc.so.6 =
Hello.
after upgrading to evolution-2.2 my imaps mailboxes stoped working with
error: SSL unsupported. I've checked the sources and in debian/rules
there is --without-ssl option. I've tried compiling without this option,
the ssl unsupported is still there.
in my chroot, ssl works fine.
After
Hi,
I am running OpenOffice in a chroot (as described in debian-amd64-howto), but
the version packaged is 1.1.3 ; and I am supposed to test the new 2.0 beta.
I installed this version (using alien, since this beta is packaged as rpm's).
Now the question is : which version of java am I to install
Hi,
Have any of you got VMware working in pure64? I've tried all kinds of
combinations, 5 Beta, 4.5.2 with any-any-update89 patch, inside,
outside, or partially inside the ia32 chroot, but it never seems to
work. In the worst case (installing inside chroot) it can't build the
kernel modules, in
Hello,
sorry for my english.
I use pure64 Sarge with kernel from kernel.org 2.6.11,
5 Beta work perfectly for me:Fedore Core 2 and Solaris 10 work on it in
console. I didn't try use X on it.
I simply unzip vmware*.tar.gz and run vmware-install.pl
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 15:01:52 +0200
Major A [EMAIL
On 08 Apr 2005, Major A wrote:
If you've successfully installed VMware, please let me know how it's
done.
I'd ask you what kernel version you are using as I just
had to revert from 2.6.12-rc2 on a machine back to 2.6.10 (I've
just skipped 2.6.11.? entirely up to this point and 2.6.10
I have been talking with the SPARC developers about just what kind of
machine I should by for a project I have been assigned. Remarkably
they suggested processors other than SPARC.
I have been working for the State of Florida, Department of State,
Division of Cultural Affairs for several years
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 03:02:57PM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
I have been talking with the SPARC developers about just what kind of
machine I should by for a project I have been assigned. Remarkably
they suggested processors other than SPARC.
I have been working for the State of Florida,
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 03:02:57PM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
Of course anything with more than one cpu isn't cheap (although compared
to a sun sparc system they probably are cheap). An athlon 64 system is
cheap, but an opteron system is quite a bit more, although nowhere near
what a xeon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If nothing else an opteron runs the i386 version of debian faster
thananything else, and if you need 64bit support, it can do that too (I
believe sarge does have amd64-libs and an amd64 kernel that can be used
on i386 sarge to run 64bit programs when there is a need for
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 22:36 +0200, Oliver Korpilla wrote:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 03:02:57PM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
Of course anything with more than one cpu isn't cheap (although compared
to a sun sparc system they probably are cheap). An athlon 64 system is
cheap, but an opteron
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 02:23:58PM -0700, Jacob Bresciani wrote:
I'll counter the HP recommendation with Sun, their V20z (up to 2way) and
V40z (up to 4 way) line are very nice machines are very reasonable
prices, about 6K Canadian for 2 250 opteron's 2Gig of Ram and a pair of
36G SCSI drives.
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 17:25 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 02:23:58PM -0700, Jacob Bresciani wrote:
I'll counter the HP recommendation with Sun, their V20z (up to 2way) and
V40z (up to 4 way) line are very nice machines are very reasonable
prices, about 6K Canadian
Hi list
i use the following sources.list:
cat /etc/apt/sources.list
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 sarge main
contrib non-free
and i try to install
apt-get install libgtk2-dev
Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut... Fertig
E: Konnte Paket
I just found out that mozilla-browser-1.7.6 in pure64 is compiled
against libstdc++-6 while epiphany is compiled against version 5.
Actually, none other package in my system seems to be using libstdc++-6,
neither does mozilla-browser for all the other official architectures.
In the case that
Hallo Alex,
El sb, 09-04-2005 a las 01:39 +0200, Alexander Nagel escribi:
When i use
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64 sarge main contrib non-free
redkeep:/home/alex# apt-get install -V libgtk2.0-dev
Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
Abhngigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut...
If I open and close GNOME Meeting without placing any calls, it crashes.
This seems to be 100% reproducible on pure64 on my computer. Anybody
else sees the same or a different behavior?
Should I open reports on the Debian BTS for pure64 non-packaging bugs?
Thanks,
--
Javier Kohen [EMAIL
19 matches
Mail list logo
