On 2013-09-01 09:33, Niels Thykier wrote:
Hi,
As we announced in [LAST-BITS], we would like to get a better idea of
that status of the ports, to make an informed decision about which
port can be released with jessie. One of the steps is to get an
overview of which of the porters are (still)
Hi!
I'm not a DD or DM, but an upstream contributor and maintainer for the
toolchain, both for different things at work, and in my free time for the
Hurd. I have no plans to stop this, so this will cover the jessie
lifetime. As time permits, I also work on the Hurd itself, and advise
On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 09:33 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
Hi,
I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend
to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release:
For hurd-i386, I
- test most packages on this architecture
- fix toolchain issues
- triage arch-specific bugs
-
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:38:29AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
Here is a little status update on the mails we have received so far.
First off, thanks to all the porters who have already replied!
So far, the *no one* has stepped up to back the following architectures:
hurd-i386
ia64
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I'm particularly keen to see communication packages working on as many
architectures as possible because otherwise two-way communications
opportunities are missed if some users are excluded.
In short, I'm not formally volunteering, but if people
5 matches
Mail list logo
