amd64 security - was Re: X.org and NVidia

On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 09:51 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > GOMBAS Gabor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 09:24:42AM -0400, Matthias Julius wrote: > > > >> I think staying with testing is the best thing to do for > >> non-developers anyways. > > > > Has the problem of

Re: nv_sata

If I remember well the easiest way to solve thist problem was to disable in BIOS the second SATA channel (don't remember if this is the correct name, but I had two SATA disks and I could use both of them even after disabling the second unused interface). Pavel On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 12:59 +0200,

Re: security support

for sarge. As soon as there will > be, security.debian.org will carry amd64 pacakges, too. > > Best regards > Frederik Schueler > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 09:20:18PM +0200, Pavel Jurus wrote: > > Ahh thanks for clarifying of this issue. In this case I would however > &g

Re: security support

+0200, Sythos wrote: > Il Wed, 15 Jun 2005 19:06:46 +0200 > Pavel Jurus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scrisse: > > > That means that AMD64 sarge will not get security updates? From what I > > understand AMD64 should become official port (hopefully) soon - but that > > would mean tha

Re: security support

15 at 18:24 +0200, Sythos wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 06:10:56PM +0200, Pavel Jurus wrote: > > In many places is written that although AMD64 port of sarge is > > unofficial it has full security support of debian-security team. > > I cannot find any amd64 packages on

security support

In many places is written that although AMD64 port of sarge is unofficial it has full security support of debian-security team. I cannot find any amd64 packages on security.debian.org though. Where can I find security updates for the AMD64 sarge? Pavel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC

solved - Re: libc6 packages not in gcc4 "Packages" list

I hate to reply to my own mails but Packages file seems to be corrected now:) Thanks Pavel On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 11:52 +0200, Pavel Jurus wrote: > To clarify my question - I'm talking about AMD64 debian port that is > compiled by the gcc4 branch. But since this port is even "m

Re: libc6 packages not in gcc4 "Packages" list

'm wrong. Pavel On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 11:15 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Pavel Jurus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I wanted to upgrade one of my computers using this /etc/apt/sources.list > > > > "deb http://debian-ppc64.alioth.debian.org/gcc4

libc6 packages not in gcc4 "Packages" list

kages file. Looking at http://debian-ppc64.alioth.debian.org/gcc4/pool/main/g/glibc/ however shows libc6_2.3.5-1_amd64.deb which is probably the needed package. What's the problem with Packages file and how can I solve/work around it? Pavel Jurus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

where can I find gcc-4.0?

Please could someone tell me where can I find distribution compiled by gcc-4.0 (former amd64-gcc-3.4 branch)? Pavel Jurus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

gcc-3.4 branch gone?

c and fortran95 on pure AMD64 Debian? Pavel Jurus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]