Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Is the AMD-64 ready for reliable use? (possibly on K8V-MX moptherboard)]

2006-01-01 Thread Chris Bannister
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 08:21:11PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > (which is still unofficial). Ans as security is a severe problem on any > server, I would recommend staying with Sarge/Stable and applying all security > updates (which aren't available in Etch/Testing an Sid/Unstable). Etch no

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Is the AMD-64 ready for reliable use? (possibly on K8V-MX moptherboard)]

2005-12-22 Thread Dean Hamstead
this is left up to the distribution a non-chroot environment will install in /emul and you can install a chroot environment wherever you like. there are also /lib and /lib64 directoried (in the same way that sparc64 implements things) but in debian things dont seem to be done like that. in fedor

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Is the AMD-64 ready for reliable use? (possibly on K8V-MX moptherboard)]

2005-12-22 Thread hendrik
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 02:20:56PM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 09:34:29AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I'm considering buying a box and putting the AMD64 port of sarge > > on it. > > > > I can see lots of problems with the AMD64 port on the mailing > > list, but

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Is the AMD-64 ready for reliable use? (possibly on K8V-MX moptherboard)]

2005-12-22 Thread cbergmann
On Thursday 22 December 2005 15:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm considering buying a box and putting the AMD64 port of sarge > on it. > > I can see lots of problems with the AMD64 port on the mailing > list, but that doesn't make it clear whether troubles are normal > or unusual. Very few happy

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Is the AMD-64 ready for reliable use? (possibly on K8V-MX moptherboard)]

2005-12-22 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 09:34:29AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm considering buying a box and putting the AMD64 port of sarge > on it. > > I can see lots of problems with the AMD64 port on the mailing > list, but that doesn't make it clear whether troubles are normal > or unusual. Very fe

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Is the AMD-64 ready for reliable use? (possibly on K8V-MX moptherboard)]

2005-12-22 Thread Matthew Robinson
On Thursday 22 December 2005 14:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm considering buying a box and putting the AMD64 port of sarge > on it. we're running a production server on it. not had much testing yet, i'l know within a month if its up to it :). its supported by the debian security team though.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Is the AMD-64 ready for reliable use? (possibly on K8V-MX moptherboard)]

2005-12-22 Thread hendrik
I'm considering buying a box and putting the AMD64 port of sarge on it. I can see lots of problems with the AMD64 port on the mailing list, but that doesn't make it clear whether troubles are normal or unusual. Very few happy users ever write in to say how happy they are, I have had it proposed