Am Montag, 13. März 2006 00:37 schrieb sigi:
>
> Using the vesa-driver, the problem is less problematic.
> Did somebody get another solution than using the vesa-driver?
seems a common problem follow the thread at
http://ati.cchtml.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248
--
mit freundlichem Gruss -- regard
Hi,
> I'm running a shuttle xpc st 20g5, with an ATI Radeon Xpress 200 on board
> graphics. But when I use the ati driver (8.22.5) it turns the dvi port off,
> and on every window redraw the desktop flickers horizontally.
>
> I do not have those problems with the std vesa driver.
>
> Do you ha
Hello,
I'm running a shuttle xpc st 20g5, with an ATI Radeon Xpress 200 on board
graphics. But when I use the ati driver (8.22.5) it turns the dvi port off,
and on every window redraw the desktop flickers horizontally.
I do not have those problems with the std vesa driver.
Do you had similar p
OK i found patch:
http://www.stanchina.net/~flavio/debian/fglrx-archive/msg00908.html
greetings
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi
i have problem with include module fglrx into new kernel. Script compile
module with success, but show some warnings:
*** Warning: "unregister_ioctl32_conversion"
[/usr/src/modules/fglrx/fglrx.ko] undefined!
*** Warning: "register_ioctl32_conversi
Ernest jw ter Kuile wrote:
On Sunday 25 September 2005 18:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm thinking that accelerated OpenGL drivers should be part of the
distribution, with options available for choosing what flavor one would
like to go with. I believe that this would make it easier on ever
On Sunday 25 September 2005 18:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I'm thinking that accelerated OpenGL drivers should be part of the
> distribution, with options available for choosing what flavor one would
> like to go with. I believe that this would make it easier on everyone.
>
Very true. It's j
Thank's Tobias and everyone else,
Looks like I'll be doing some playing around, as soon as I do an install to a
new partition to my harddrive. This way, I don't end up nuking what's
running now.
I'm thinking that accelerated OpenGL drivers should be part of the
distribution, with options ava
> I failed to build the module on 64 bit architecture:
Have a look here :
http://www.rage3d.com/board/showpost.php?p=1333860578&postcount=54
(install and untar the fglrx kernel source made by the flavio's source
in /usr/src/modules)
Edit /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.c
and replace the
Dimanche 25 septembre 2005, 10:41:02 CEST, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) a écrit :
>[...]
> I failed to build the module on 64 bit architecture:
>
>
> /usr/bin/make -C /usr/src/linux SUBDIRS=/usr/src/modules/fglrx modules
>[...]
> /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.c:124:25: error: asm/ioctl32.h: No
Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote:
> Le 25.09.2005 05:30:39, Sylvain Sauvage a écrit :
>
>> Samedi 24 septembre 2005, 19:11:20 CEST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
>> >
>> > I downloaded the ATI drivers, ran the installation shell script and
>> I'm
>> >
Le 25.09.2005 05:30:39, Sylvain Sauvage a écrit :
Samedi 24 septembre 2005, 19:11:20 CEST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
>
> I downloaded the ATI drivers, ran the installation shell script and
I'm
> seeing no performance increase. Anyone have any advise? Has anyone
> documented
Hi Peter,
> http://xoomer.virgilio.it/flavio.stanchina/debian/fglrx-installer.html
for my notebook it did not work out. I had to change some things:
http://www.design-to-use.de/linux/amilo_a1630/radeon9700.php
This is a German page, but you will know what to do.
Greetings, Tobias
--
To UNSU
Samedi 24 septembre 2005, 19:11:20 CEST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
>
> I downloaded the ATI drivers, ran the installation shell script and I'm
> seeing no performance increase. Anyone have any advise? Has anyone
> documented what one needs to do?
Look here:
http://x
I downloaded the ATI drivers, ran the installation shell script and I'm seeing
no performance increase. Anyone have any advise? Has anyone documented what
one needs to do?
Peter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
John Baab wrote:
> I am attempting to install the ati drives located here:
> http://rufus.hackish.org/~rufus/files/fglrx/
>
> Using the instructions in this faq:
> http://xoomer.virgilio.it/flavio.stanchina/debian/fglrx-installer.html
>
> /usr/src/modules/fglrx-kernel-src/agpgart_be.c: In functio
I am attempting to install the ati drives located here:
http://rufus.hackish.org/~rufus/files/fglrx/
Using the instructions in this faq:
http://xoomer.virgilio.it/flavio.stanchina/debian/fglrx-installer.html
Which seems to be the recomendation around here.
Now I am running into problems in step:
f.carone wrote:
I was originally interested in the improved open source Radeon code with
DRI and have not tried the composite and transparency in your
question.
Try it if you can, as I'd like to know if this is an issue of my
installation or not. Googling a bit, it seems this 'slowlyness'
affects
* the owner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ha scritto:
> What is the ATI video card you use?
Radeon 9200 with 128Mb
> I was originally interested in the improved open source Radeon code with
> DRI and have not tried the composite and transparency in your
> question.
Try it if you can, as I'd like to know
f.carone wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm using the ubuntu Xorg server, with the composite and transparency
correctly working. I'm also using the opensource radeon driver shipped
with it. I get good 3D performances (~2000fps in windowed glxgears)
but transparency (set by transset) is really slow, while I
I had similar DRI issue due the following things:
1. Have to load agpgart and the module that corresponds to your agp
chipset (For instance on my Gigabyte K8NS Ultra 939 m/b I need agpgart
and amd64_agp modules loaded) You'll need to check your hardware for the
right modules
2. the XF86Config-4/x
> I'm trying them, but:
> - glxgears runs at half speed (~800fps windowed)
> - if I enable the Composite extension in xorg.conf, DRI will be
> disabled:
> (II) fglrx(0): Composite extension enabled, disabling direct rendering
> (WW) fglrx(0): ***
> (WW)
* Andrei Mikhailovsky ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ha scritto:
> Try fglrx and see for yourself )
I'm trying them, but:
- glxgears runs at half speed (~800fps windowed)
- if I enable the Composite extension in xorg.conf, DRI will be
disabled:
(II) fglrx(0): Composite extension enabled, disabling direct r
On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 12:52 +0100, Filippo Carone wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> I'm using the ubuntu Xorg server, with the composite and transparency
> correctly working. I'm also using the opensource radeon driver shipped
> with it. I get good 3D performances (~2000fps in windowed glxgears)
> but tr
Hi everybody,
I'm using the ubuntu Xorg server, with the composite and transparency
correctly working. I'm also using the opensource radeon driver shipped
with it. I get good 3D performances (~2000fps in windowed glxgears)
but transparency (set by transset) is really slow, while I expected it
to
I'm a little messed up trying to install ATI drivers.
Due to a previous wrong Nvidia installation, now I (think I have) a
corrupted libglx.so which needs libGLcore.so.1 contained in Nvidia
binary packages.
Sadly now I can't understand how to solve this thing. As from
packages.debian.
Great, I worked without a single problem with a mobility Radeon 9700.
$ glxgears
6125 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1225.000 FPS
7565 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1513.000 FPS
Thanks!
--
Pedro
Peter Nelson wrote:
Pedro I. Sanchez wrote:
I'm following the steps in
http://xoomer.virgilio.it/flavio.stanchina/deb
Pedro I. Sanchez wrote:
I'm following the steps in
http://xoomer.virgilio.it/flavio.stanchina/debian/fglrx-installer.html
Those are the 32-bit drivers. He just posted today about the 64-bit
drivers at:
http://xoomer.virgilio.it/flavio.stanchina/debian-experimental/fglrx-experimental.html
You can
Hello,
I'm following the steps in
http://xoomer.virgilio.it/flavio.stanchina/debian/fglrx-installer.html
to install ATI's accelerated drivers. I'm getting the following error:
$ fakeroot debian/rules binary
[ ... ]
dh_shlibdeps
debian/fglrx-driver/usr/X11R6/bin/fgl_glxgears: error while loading
sh
Dnia niedziela, 23 stycznia 2005 15:14, Lukasz Pieczara napisał:
>
> I don't know what's it? but it's not good i think... i have radeon 9550
> with standard 2.6.9-10-amd64-k8 kernel, others option in my X config file:
>
> ModulePath "/usr/X11R6/lib64/modules"
> ModulePath "/usr/X11R6/lib/m
Dnia niedziela, 23 stycznia 2005 03:26, Aritz Beraza Garayalde [Rei] napisał:
>
> I had the same problem, and module-assistant seems to keep aside
> variables such as CC or GCC, so y rmoved symlinck from /usr/bin/gcc to
> /usr/bin/gcc-3.3 and replaced it with a new simlink from /usr/bin/gcc
> to /
> i try insert module into kernel;
>
> # modprobe fglrx
> FATAL: Error inserting fglrx
> (/lib/modules/2.6.8-10-amd64-k8/kernel/drivers/char/drm/fglrx.ko): Invalid
> module format
>
> dmesg returned:
>
> fglrx: version magic '2.6.8-10-amd64-k8 gcc-3.3' should be '2.6.8-10-amd64-k8
> gcc-3.4'
>
Le 22.01.2005 22:25:21, Lukasz Pieczara a écrit :
i try insert module into kernel;
# modprobe fglrx
FATAL: Error inserting fglrx
(/lib/modules/2.6.8-10-amd64-k8/kernel/drivers/char/drm/fglrx.ko):
Invalid
module format
dmesg returned:
fglrx: version magic '2.6.8-10-amd64-k8 gcc-3.3' should be
'2.6.8
i try insert module into kernel;
# modprobe fglrx
FATAL: Error inserting fglrx
(/lib/modules/2.6.8-10-amd64-k8/kernel/drivers/char/drm/fglrx.ko): Invalid
module format
dmesg returned:
fglrx: version magic '2.6.8-10-amd64-k8 gcc-3.3' should be '2.6.8-10-amd64-k8
gcc-3.4'
# cat /proc/version
L
34 matches
Mail list logo
