Libglade2-2.4.1-2 not in gcc-3.4

2005-02-03 Thread Javier Kohen
Hi, I wanted to update a couple packages that depend on the 2.4.1-2 version of the libglade2 package, but for some reason it hasn't been uploaded to the gcc-3.4 pool. I see it in the pure64 tree and according to the buildd logs in

Re: Libglade2-2.4.1-2 not in gcc-3.4

2005-02-03 Thread Javier Kohen
Only that apt-src won't run, it aborts with a Segmentation Fault. I remember I reported this about 10 days ago regarding a similar problem with cvs. Thanks anyway, I'll get the sources by hand with apt-get source. Michal Schmidt wrote: Javier Kohen wrote: Hi, I wanted to update a couple

Re: Libglade2-2.4.1-2 not in gcc-3.4

2005-02-03 Thread Michal Schmidt
Javier Kohen wrote: Only that apt-src won't run, it aborts with a Segmentation Fault. I remember I reported this about 10 days ago regarding a similar problem with cvs. I reported the segfault with apt-src a week ago to this mailing list with the subject gcc-3.4: apt-src crashes with SIGSEGV. I

Re: Libglade2-2.4.1-2 not in gcc-3.4

2005-02-03 Thread Andreas Jochens
On 05-Feb-03 11:17, Javier Kohen wrote: Hi, I wanted to update a couple packages that depend on the 2.4.1-2 version of the libglade2 package, but for some reason it hasn't been uploaded to the gcc-3.4 pool. I see it in the pure64 tree and according to the buildd logs in

Re: Libglade2-2.4.1-2 not in gcc-3.4

2005-02-03 Thread Andreas Jochens
On 05-Feb-03 18:19, Michal Schmidt wrote: I reported the segfault with apt-src a week ago to this mailing list with the subject gcc-3.4: apt-src crashes with SIGSEGV. I also described a workaround (recompile libapt-pkg-perl with g++-4.0). I recompiled libapt-pkg-perl with g++-4.0 and

Re: Libglade2-2.4.1-2 not in gcc-3.4

2005-02-03 Thread Javier Kohen
Thanks a lot. Any idea why cvs_1:1.12.9-10 compiled locally with gcc (GCC) 3.4.4 20041218 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.3-7.0.0.1.gcc4) works great (for me), but the one in the gcc-3.4 repository segfaults frequently? Andreas Jochens wrote: On 05-Feb-03 11:17, Javier Kohen wrote: Hi, I wanted to

Re: Libglade2-2.4.1-2 not in gcc-3.4

2005-02-03 Thread Michal Schmidt
Andreas Jochens wrote: On 05-Feb-03 18:19, Michal Schmidt wrote: I recompiled libapt-pkg-perl with g++-4.0 and uploaded the new version to the gcc-3.4 archive on alioth. Could you try 'apt-get install --reinstall libapt-pkg-perl apt-src' to verify if it works now? No. When I do that, apt-src

Re: Libglade2-2.4.1-2 not in gcc-3.4

2005-02-03 Thread Michal Schmidt
Michal Schmidt wrote: Andreas Jochens wrote: On 05-Feb-03 18:19, Michal Schmidt wrote: I recompiled libapt-pkg-perl with g++-4.0 and uploaded the new version to the gcc-3.4 archive on alioth. Could you try 'apt-get install --reinstall libapt-pkg-perl apt-src' to verify if it works now? No. When I

Re: Libglade2-2.4.1-2 not in gcc-3.4

2005-02-03 Thread Andreas Jochens
On 05-Feb-03 13:50, Javier Kohen wrote: Thanks a lot. Any idea why cvs_1:1.12.9-10 compiled locally with gcc (GCC) 3.4.4 20041218 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.3-7.0.0.1.gcc4) works great (for me), but the one in the gcc-3.4 repository segfaults frequently? Not yet. I can confirm that cvs