[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) writes:
>> > At the time it seemed reasonable to wait for the maintainer to react
>> > to the bug and to upload a fixed version. After 113 days that does
>> > not seem to be going to happen in time for sarge.
>
> Okay, so we are still left with what to do about this
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) writes:
> > But now that I am looking at the package in more detail I am not
> > convinced that this problem is the same as the file skew problem. The
> > diff.gz does patch both the pinfo.info and pinfo.texi files. A time
> > skew coul
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) writes:
> While walking through my list of things needed for amd64 I found that
> 'pinfo' still is not fixed. The 'pinfo' package is not installable on
> amd64 at this time.
>
> Previous discussion of this problem is here:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-amd64/
While walking through my list of things needed for amd64 I found that
'pinfo' still is not fixed. The 'pinfo' package is not installable on
amd64 at this time.
Previous discussion of this problem is here:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-amd64/2005/01/msg00155.html
It was determined at the time
4 matches
Mail list logo