There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
busybox-static_1.1.3-1_amd64.deb: package says priority is optional, override
says extra.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and t
Accepted:
base-installer_1.59.dsc
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.59.dsc
base-installer_1.59.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.59.tar.gz
base-installer_1.59_i386.udeb
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.59_i386.udeb
Announcing to debian-devel-cha
Accepted:
busybox-static_1.1.3-1_amd64.deb
to pool/main/b/busybox/busybox-static_1.1.3-1_amd64.deb
busybox-udeb_1.1.3-1_amd64.udeb
to pool/main/b/busybox/busybox-udeb_1.1.3-1_amd64.udeb
busybox_1.1.3-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/b/busybox/busybox_1.1.3-1.diff.gz
busybox_1.1.3-1.dsc
to pool/main/
Hello my dear fariend
I was looking bthrough the web few weeks ago and fouand
your profile. Now I decided to email you to get toa know
you better. I am coming to your country in few weeks
and thought may be we can meet each bother. I am bpretty
looking girl. I am 25. Do not reply to this addbress
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # third parties should call depmod, preffereably in anna
> reassign 369256 anna
Bug#369256: module-init-tools-udeb: modprobe does not find kernel modules
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `anna'.
> retitle 369256 anna: should call d
# third parties should call depmod, preffereably in anna
reassign 369256 anna
retitle 369256 anna: should call depmod after a set of installed modules
# the D-I environment would be to slow to run depmod after each
# package installation
# It would be a lot better if anna would ran depmod after a
Your message dated Fri, 2 Jun 2006 01:29:17 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line partman-lvm: bugs fixed in version 36
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Fri, 2 Jun 2006 01:29:17 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line partman-lvm: bugs fixed in version 36
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Fri, 2 Jun 2006 01:29:17 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line partman-lvm: bugs fixed in version 36
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Fri, 2 Jun 2006 01:29:17 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line partman-lvm: bugs fixed in version 36
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> reassign 257661 partman-md
Bug#257661: partman-lvm: undo changes infloop?
Bug reassigned from package `partman-lvm' to `partman-md'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Plea
Your message dated Fri, 2 Jun 2006 01:29:17 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line partman-lvm: bugs fixed in version 36
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Does this bug report contain any partman-lvm related bugs? The only
outstanding issues seem to relate to yaboot?
Re,
David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
base-installer_1.59_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-installer_1.59.dsc
base-installer_1.59.tar.gz
base-installer_1.59_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
maximilian attems wrote:
> belows patch fixes the correct tools dir choice.
> a bit annoyed by svn diff, i did _not_ touch the yaird entry.
> thanks a lot for the quick support.
>
>
> Index: debian/postinst
> ===
> --- debian/postins
On Wed, 24 May 2006, Joey Hess wrote:
> maximilian attems wrote:
> > latest initramfs-tools mv /etc/mkinitramfs /etc/initramfs-tools
> > for better consistency. (package on mentors not yet in unstable)
> >
> > d-i uses in base-installer as confdir /target/etc/mkinitramfs/
> > in postinst. how sho
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> reassign 304677 mdcfg
Bug#304677: Devfs names are shown in the partitioning UI
Bug reassigned from package `partman-md, partman-lvm' to `mdcfg'.
>
End of message, stopping processing
On Sun, 28 May 2006 11:41:25 +0200 Davide Viti wrote:
> On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 07:06:22PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
> > Additional info:
> >
> > ö + ä + ü doesn't work in both installers
> > (with correct layout chosen; read further)
> >
> > AND
> >
> > in g-i the wrong keyboard layout is ch
Hello,
I intent to close this bug since nobody saw it in a so long
time. Please try to reproduce and send more information about it
otherwise it'll be close.
Thanks in advance,
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 24 May 2006, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 09:04:11AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > latest initramfs-tools mv /etc/mkinitramfs /etc/initramfs-tools
> > for better consistency. (package on mentors not yet in unstable)
>
> Just a plain NACK. It moves files around whic
On Thu, 01 Jun 2006 10:54:01 +0200 Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> my mailes are being bounced back, could someone forward my previous mail
> (the one i'm replyng to ) to bjorn?
>
> thank
>
> Attilio
Done.
--
==
Created with Sylpheed-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> reassign 369760 linux
Bug#369760: Video problems installing etch on oldworld PowerPC Mac (beige G3)
Warning: Unknown package 'linux'
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to
busybox_1.1.3-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
busybox_1.1.3-1.dsc
busybox_1.1.3.orig.tar.gz
busybox_1.1.3-1.diff.gz
busybox_1.1.3-1_amd64.deb
busybox-static_1.1.3-1_amd64.deb
busybox-udeb_1.1.3-1_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.31.2001 +0200]:
> Index: packages/mdcfg/mdcfg.sh
> ===
> --- packages/mdcfg/mdcfg.sh (revision 37707)
> +++ packages/mdcfg/mdcfg.sh (working copy)
> @@ -484,7 +484,8 @@
> mkdir
Do not ignore me please,
I found your email somewhere and now decided to write you.
I am coming to your place in few weeks and thought we
can meet each other. Let me know if you do not mind.
I am a nice pretty girl. Don't rbeply to this email.
Email me direclty at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNS
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.01.0423 +0200]:
> I uploaded mdadm-udeb 2.4.1-2 into unstable tonight. Please let it
> progress into testing (it's a UDEB and thus requires a hint,
> AFAICR).
16:20 < fjp> vorlon: Please remove hint for mdadm. In
<[EMAIL PROTEC
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 02:13:47PM +0200, "Nölle, Christian" wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 02:29:13PM +0100, "Nölle, Christian" wrote:
> >> Sven Luther wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 12:31:35PM +0100, "Nölle, Christian" wrote:
> Tried it today with the image fro
Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 02:29:13PM +0100, "Nölle, Christian" wrote:
>> Sven Luther wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 12:31:35PM +0100, "Nölle, Christian" wrote:
Tried it today with the image from last night and the problem still
persists. Installer is completly unusa
Package: installation-reports
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Boot method: USB stick
Image version: stable (Sarge)
Date: June, 1st 2006 - 12AM GMT
Machine: i386 workstation
Processor: AMD Sempron
Memory: 512MB
Root Device: not detected
Partitions: no disk detected
Ini
Accepted:
zipl-installer_0.0.7.dsc
to pool/main/z/zipl-installer/zipl-installer_0.0.7.dsc
zipl-installer_0.0.7.tar.gz
to pool/main/z/zipl-installer/zipl-installer_0.0.7.tar.gz
zipl-installer_0.0.7_s390.udeb
to pool/main/z/zipl-installer/zipl-installer_0.0.7_s390.udeb
Announcing to debian-dev
zipl-installer_0.0.7_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
zipl-installer_0.0.7.dsc
zipl-installer_0.0.7.tar.gz
zipl-installer_0.0.7_s390.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Christian Perrier wrote:
- Forwarded message from "B. Janssen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 20:46:19 +0200
From: "B. Janssen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#369664: Graphical DebianInstaller does
Accepted:
base-installer_1.58.dsc
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.58.dsc
base-installer_1.58.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.58.tar.gz
base-installer_1.58_s390.udeb
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.58_s390.udeb
Announcing to debian-devel-cha
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
s390-netdevice_0.0.12_s390.udeb: package says priority is optional, override
says standard.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and
Accepted:
s390-dasd_0.0.15.dsc
to pool/main/s/s390-dasd/s390-dasd_0.0.15.dsc
s390-dasd_0.0.15.tar.gz
to pool/main/s/s390-dasd/s390-dasd_0.0.15.tar.gz
s390-dasd_0.0.15_s390.udeb
to pool/main/s/s390-dasd/s390-dasd_0.0.15_s390.udeb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Thank you
Accepted:
s390-netdevice_0.0.12.dsc
to pool/main/s/s390-netdevice/s390-netdevice_0.0.12.dsc
s390-netdevice_0.0.12.tar.gz
to pool/main/s/s390-netdevice/s390-netdevice_0.0.12.tar.gz
s390-netdevice_0.0.12_s390.udeb
to pool/main/s/s390-netdevice/s390-netdevice_0.0.12_s390.udeb
Announcing to debi
(new) s390-sysconfig-writer_0.2.dsc standard debian-installer
(new) s390-sysconfig-writer_0.2.tar.gz standard debian-installer
(new) s390-sysconfig-writer_0.2_s390.udeb standard debian-installer
Sysconfig writer
Write sysconfig config files.
Changes: s390-sysconfig-writer (0.2) unstable; urgency=l
base-installer_1.58_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-installer_1.58.dsc
base-installer_1.58.tar.gz
base-installer_1.58_s390.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
s390-dasd_0.0.15_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
s390-dasd_0.0.15.dsc
s390-dasd_0.0.15.tar.gz
s390-dasd_0.0.15_s390.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
s390-netdevice_0.0.12_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
s390-netdevice_0.0.12.dsc
s390-netdevice_0.0.12.tar.gz
s390-netdevice_0.0.12_s390.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
s390-sysconfig-writer_0.2_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
s390-sysconfig-writer_0.2.dsc
s390-sysconfig-writer_0.2.tar.gz
s390-sysconfig-writer_0.2_s390.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 05:30:25PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > The first time i ran d-i in early 2003, autopartkit was the default, and it
> > ate my devel harddisk without asking any question, so i never ever looked at
> > it.
>
> Ouch. On the other hand, that's quite close to what I want t
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 08:06:57AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Autopartkit is used by the debian-edu/skolelinux folk, not sure what exactly
> it does though. BTW, what exactly do you need.
I need to be able to produce a single CD which is capable of interrogating
the system that it's running on an
Package: debian-installer
Severity: Important
I've been trying to test install the "etch" daily netinst CD on an
oldworld Mac (beige G3) and I can't get off first base because I
can't get the video to co-operate.
I'm using the BootX bootloader under MacOS-9.2.2
Before I begin describing my
> This (and the further comments you made below) give me an "aha!" moment
> about how d-i works out what to run -- it seems like, once one package which
> Provides: the appropriate bits and pieces (mounted-partitions, etc) has run,
> no others of the same ilk get run -- is that about right?
> I
45 matches
Mail list logo
