On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 17:29 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 01 March 2007 06:11, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On further thinking, I realise there are several problems with the
> > patch:
> > 1. It tries to probe even if open_filesystem is false (already
> > identified).
> > 2. It can return afte
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 11:21:08PM +0100, David Härdeman wrote:
> >I am trying to create a customized installation disk with the ability
> >to create encrypted root filesystem. In my test installations, I noticed
> >that the filesystem type is not set properly when I choose to reformat
> >filesys
ECTED]
==
Installer lsb-release:
==
DISTRIB_ID=Debian
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Debian GNU/Linux installer"
DISTRIB_RELEASE="4.0 (installer build 20070301-12:05)"
X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=netboot-2.6
===
Also, just to rule out the missing archive signing key bug and the buggy
apt that removed archive signing keys...if you do try the install again,
could you try to boot the installer with the argument
"debian-installer/allow_unauthenticated=true"
--
David Härdeman
Package: cdebconf
Version: 0.114
Severity: wishlist
In helping a user debug a d-i related problem, I noticed that using
DEBCONF_DEBUG will cause all debconf traffic, including the reply to
password prompts to be printed.
It would be nice if passwords could be special-treated so that the reply
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 11:07:04PM +0100, Kjell Rune Skaaraas wrote:
Sounds very strange that I'd get the same error on two
different images burned to two different discs, but I
ran the CD check anyway and it too says the CD is
perfectly OK. I haven't had any hardware trouble with
the burner befo
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 01:26:26PM +0100, Josef Wolf wrote:
Hello!
I am trying to create a customized installation disk with the ability
to create encrypted root filesystem. In my test installations, I noticed
that the filesystem type is not set properly when I choose to reformat
filesystems in
Hi
Sounds very strange that I'd get the same error on two
different images burned to two different discs, but I
ran the CD check anyway and it too says the CD is
perfectly OK. I haven't had any hardware trouble with
the burner before, and it seems unlikely that I'd
error out on the same place over
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> reassign 412948 installation-reports
Bug#412948: Bug in Etch debian-installer
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `installation-reports'.
>
End of message, stopping pro
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 03:51:55PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Thanks for the answer, Joey!
> Josef Wolf wrote:
> > I'd like to "apt-get update; apt-get upgrade" from preseed/late_command
> > causing the first reboot to come up with updated kernel/modules. So I
> > put this (splitted and commented f
Josef Wolf wrote:
> I'd like to "apt-get update; apt-get upgrade" from preseed/late_command
> causing the first reboot to come up with updated kernel/modules. So I
> put this (splitted and commented for readability) into my seed file:
>
> d-i preseed/late_command string \
> cp /cdrom/presee
> Looking for the signatures seem superflous,
I was suggesting that because of the metion previously in the discussion that
some systems apprently didn't like it being zero'd out, only nuking known
problem partition signatures would be much less likely to cause other issues
than nuking anything
Hello!
I'd like to "apt-get update; apt-get upgrade" from preseed/late_command
causing the first reboot to come up with updated kernel/modules. So I
put this (splitted and commented for readability) into my seed file:
d-i preseed/late_command string \
cp /cdrom/preseed/postinstall.sh /targ
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 09:09:38PM +0100, David Härdeman wrote:
Thanks four your answer, David!
> [ ... ]
> >Any ideas why the filesystem type is considered to be crypto_LUKS even
> >after it was reformatted with ext3? I even tried to set the volume
> >label in the installer, but this did not he
So the problem is that (aside from the possibility that OS9 is not
being recognized) if the other OS is OS9, the default for hardware
clock should be "local time", but if the other OS is OS-X, the
default for the hardware clock should be "UTC". Is that a correct
assessment?
I solve it
On Thursday 01 March 2007 06:11, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On further thinking, I realise there are several problems with the
> patch:
> 1. It tries to probe even if open_filesystem is false (already
> identified).
> 2. It can return after maximize_extended_partition() without rolling
> that change ba
Your message dated Thu, 01 Mar 2007 17:33:38 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#412991: tasksel: Desktop environment task hangs again
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Package: tasksel
Version: 2.66
Severity: normal
During the installation of Debian testing/Etch from the build CD1 binary
20070226-09:38 (newest atm) I was not able to finish it after the step that
runs tasksel if I selected "Desktop environment". The installation just hangs
and I was able to recre
Hi all,
Does anybody know of a way to preseed the question "Do you want to return to
the partitioning menu" when no swap space was defined?
Any value for "d-i partman-basicfilesystems/no_swap boolean" makes d-i enter
a loop... Maybe there are other neat or ugly ways to get rid of the question.
T
--- Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fortunately an alternative solution is possible:
> correcting the default after it has been read from
> the debconf database.
>
> I have implemented this solution in base-installer
> (1.13.4sarge2) and uploaded that new version to
> stable. As base-insta
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 04:11:30PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
>Unfortunately we seem to have missed a change that was needed because of
>the ABI change in 3.1r3. We have not noticed this until now because the
>old kernels were still included in the archive and on CD images. With
>3.1r5 the old imag
Unfortunately we seem to have missed a change that was needed because of
the ABI change in 3.1r3. We have not noticed this until now because the
old kernels were still included in the archive and on CD images. With
3.1r5 the old images were removed which brought the issue to the surface.
The re
On Wednesday 28 February 2007 22:26, Glenn Gagné wrote:
> L'installation s'est fait normallement jusqu'au premier redémarrage.
> Après avoir redémarré, je me suis rendu compte que l'installateur avait
> décidé d'installer le noyau "kernel-image-2.6.8-3-k7-smp.deb" et
> c'était le seul choix possibl
On Sunday 25 February 2007 11:28, Ong (MIS) wrote:
> It’s wrongly install the Kernel version to 2.6.8-3-k7-smp. Since my pc
> is intel processor.
Thank you for reporting this. There is indeed an error in the kernel
selection and we will try to correct this as soon as possible in new CD
images.
Merci, Je vais attendre la sortie de la nouvelle version !
Thank, I will wait the new version... in few days !
Regards,
Glenn
-Message d'origine-
De : Christian Perrier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : 1 mars, 2007 01:12
À : Glenn Gagné; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: Bug#412909: kerne
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 412295 412909
Bug#412295: Bugs for Debian 3.1 r5
Bug#412909: kernel-image n'est pas choisit correctement à l'installation de
Debian linux26
Merged 412295 412909.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assista
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 412295 base-installer 1.13.4sarge1
Bug#412295: Bugs for Debian 3.1 r5
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `base-installer'.
> reassign 412909 base-installer 1.13.4sarge1
Bug#412909: kernel-image n'est pas choisit correctement
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 03:26:33PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> reassign 411446 clock-setup 0.13
> retitle 411446 [powerpc] Should not select UTC for iBooks
> thanks
>
> On Monday 19 February 2007 08:12, Todd Partridge wrote:
> > Comments/Problems:
> > Used both the x86 and PPC Install Guide. The PP
On Wed, February 28, 2007 23:01, peter green said:
>> >this sounds like a bug in mke2fs to me, it is not cleaning up
>> the sectors
>> >before its header and as a result the partition gets misrecognised.
>>
>> I think it's there because some arches and some partitioning schemes
>> actually have rea
Quoting Martin Michlmayr ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> bubulle, can you provide a quick translation?
Sure. Note the Glenn Gagné: les rapports de bug Debian devraient de
préférence être envoyés en language anglaise, qui est la langue
commune de tous les développeurs du projet. Si vous avez des
difficultés
30 matches
Mail list logo
