Package: debian-installer-manual
Severity: normal
Hello,
The pressed appendix mention :
#Additional repositories, local[0-9] available
#d-i apt-setup/local0/repository string \
# deb http://local.server/debian stable main
This adds a 'deb deb http://local.server/debian stable main' in the
reassign 420894 installation-guide
tags 420894 + pending
thanks
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 18:07, Rémi Demarthe wrote:
#Additional repositories, local[0-9] available
#d-i apt-setup/local0/repository string \
# deb http://local.server/debian stable main
This adds a 'deb deb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 420894 installation-guide
Bug#420894: debian-installer-manual: [appendix/preseed]
apt-setup/local0/repository string does not contain 'deb'
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer-manual' to `installation-guide'.
tags 420894 + pending
flash-kernel_1.2_arm.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
flash-kernel_1.2.dsc
flash-kernel_1.2.tar.gz
flash-kernel_1.2_arm.deb
flash-kernel-installer_1.2_arm.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted:
flash-kernel-installer_1.2_arm.udeb
to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel-installer_1.2_arm.udeb
flash-kernel_1.2.dsc
to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel_1.2.dsc
flash-kernel_1.2.tar.gz
to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel_1.2.tar.gz
flash-kernel_1.2_arm.deb
to
Your message dated Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:02:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#413373: fixed in flash-kernel 1.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:02:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#403017: fixed in flash-kernel 1.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:02:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#411551: fixed in flash-kernel 1.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 410065 installation-guide-arm
Bug#410065: installation-report: d-i rc1, NSLU2: minor network-console and boot
issues
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `installation-guide-arm'.
retitle 410065 Describe NSLU2 installation
* Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-26 17:48]:
From where would I run anna-install? Is there some infrastructure or
would I need to add a d-i startup script?
Somewhere in rootskel, or else in hw-detect. The last is probably more
logical.
Background: installations on NSLU2 run in lowmem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
We, the GRUB team, want to swtich to GRUB2 due many reasons, basicaly:
- easier to maintain;
- better codebase;
- multi-arch support;
- active upstream;
Our current plan is to finish the update-grub2 merging on upstream
side (being
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 09:59:51AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
We, the GRUB team, want to swtich to GRUB2 due many reasons, basicaly:
- easier to maintain;
- better codebase;
- multi-arch support;
- active upstream;
Our
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I wonder if we will also move from yaboot-installer to grub2-installer
on powerpc, and if you have given any thought to that migration path ?
Our main goal is to switch i386 and amd64 first.
We intend to use GRUB2 as much as possible also to reduce the
Your message dated Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:23:53 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line should work
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Op 25-04-2007 om 10:18 schreef Otavio Salvador:
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I wonder if we will also move from yaboot-installer to grub2-installer
on powerpc, and if you have given any thought to that migration path ?
Our main goal is to switch i386 and amd64 first.
My advice
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 09:59:51AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
We, the GRUB team, want to swtich to GRUB2 due many reasons, basicaly:
- easier to maintain;
- better codebase;
- multi-arch support;
- active upstream;
Our
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Our current plan is to finish the update-grub2 merging on upstream
side (being handled by Robert) and then upload a new package to
Debian. This package after moving to lenny ought be set as default
boot-loader in grub-installer (while we still offer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geert Stappers) writes:
Op 25-04-2007 om 10:18 schreef Otavio Salvador:
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I wonder if we will also move from yaboot-installer to grub2-installer
on powerpc, and if you have given any thought to that migration path ?
Our main goal
Op 25-04-2007 om 11:52 schreef Frans Pop:
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 18:07, Rémi Demarthe wrote:
This just need to remove the 'deb' in each translation.
Fixed in SVN. Thanks.
What about fixing it in the Etch SVN branch also?
HtH
GSt
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 16:02, Geert Stappers wrote:
What about fixing it in the Etch SVN branch also?
Not needed. Trunk will be published for Etch.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 420950 pending
thanks
Quoting senthil kumar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
package: tasksel
version: 1.1
translate: tamil
status: installed
i download from translation underway and modified that package
i install its working good ... i want to upload this file
Commited. However,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 420950 pending
Bug#420950: i translated tamil tasksel package
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Op 25-04-2007 om 10:54 schreef Otavio Salvador:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geert Stappers) writes:
My advice to make that switch (and switch back) more easy,
is to implement a bootselector.
bootloaderselector.
You mean for the both grub and grub2?
Well, we want to reduce the grub usage and
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 10:52:50AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Our current plan is to finish the update-grub2 merging on upstream
side (being handled by Robert) and then upload a new package to
Debian. This package after moving to lenny ought be
debian-installer-utils_1.48_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-installer-utils_1.48.dsc
debian-installer-utils_1.48.tar.gz
di-utils-shell_1.48_all.udeb
di-utils-reboot_1.48_all.udeb
di-utils-exit-installer_1.48_all.udeb
Accepted:
debian-installer-utils_1.48.dsc
to pool/main/d/debian-installer-utils/debian-installer-utils_1.48.dsc
debian-installer-utils_1.48.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/debian-installer-utils/debian-installer-utils_1.48.tar.gz
di-utils-exit-installer_1.48_all.udeb
to
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 14:59, Otavio Salvador wrote:
We, the GRUB team, want to swtich to GRUB2 due many reasons, basicaly:
- better codebase;
Is grub2 fundamentally different from grub, or is it basically based on
the current grub but just developed further?
- multi-arch support;
Do
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 14:59, Otavio Salvador wrote:
We, the GRUB team, want to swtich to GRUB2 due many reasons, basicaly:
- better codebase;
Is grub2 fundamentally different from grub, or is it basically based on
the current grub but just
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 09:59:51AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
We, the GRUB team, want to swtich to GRUB2 due many reasons, basicaly:
- easier to maintain;
- better codebase;
- multi-arch support;
support for multiple architectures :)
Our current plan is to finish the update-grub2
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 06:56:59PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
reopen 419386
reassign 419386 netcfg 1.37
forcemerge 419386 410560
thanks
In going through the log, I noted something else in choosing a
connection I was offered eth0 or eth1. eth0 is I think the firewire
connection and was the
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 21:01, Henry Bremridge wrote:
Mini-installation worked, I am not sure where the syslog saved to.
During the installation the syslog is in /var/log/syslog. you can use
the Save debug logs option in the main menu to get it off the system.
Installation chose the
linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.04_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.04.dsc
linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.04.tar.gz
loop-aes-modules-2.6.20-1-amd64-di_1.04_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To
linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.04_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.04.dsc
linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.04.tar.gz
loop-aes-modules-2.6.20-1-486-di_1.04_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.04.dsc
to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6/linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.04.dsc
linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.04.tar.gz
to
pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6/linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.04.tar.gz
(new) loop-aes-modules-2.6.20-1-amd64-di_1.04_amd64.udeb
linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.04.dsc
to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-i386-2.6/linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.04.dsc
linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.04.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-i386-2.6/linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.04.tar.gz
(new) loop-aes-modules-2.6.20-1-486-di_1.04_i386.udeb extra
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.24_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.24.dsc
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.24.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.20-1-amd64-di_1.24_amd64.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.20-1-amd64-di_1.24_amd64.udeb
linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.46_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.46.dsc
linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.46.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.20-1-486-di_1.46_i386.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.20-1-486-di_1.46_i386.udeb
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Frans already asked most of the questions that I had. A few others:
Is anybody else using grub2 as a default bootloader today?
Not yet.
Has testing of grub2 explicitly included testing on older x86 systems, given
that we've found that i486 was
Accepted:
acpi-modules-2.6.20-1-amd64-di_1.24_amd64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/acpi-modules-2.6.20-1-amd64-di_1.24_amd64.udeb
ata-modules-2.6.20-1-amd64-di_1.24_amd64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/ata-modules-2.6.20-1-amd64-di_1.24_amd64.udeb
acpi-modules-2.6.20-1-486-di_1.46_i386.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/acpi-modules-2.6.20-1-486-di_1.46_i386.udeb
ata-modules-2.6.20-1-486-di_1.46_i386.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/ata-modules-2.6.20-1-486-di_1.46_i386.udeb
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 05:14:09PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
The upgrade from grub to grub2 will be transparent since menu.list can
be automaticaly converted to the new format and this will be in place
when we start the default boot-loader change.
Hrm. What was wrong with the
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 05:14:09PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Hrm. What was wrong with the existing format? :/ Those are the kinds of
upstream changes that are most aggravating for administrators (or at least
for this administrator here :).
Op 21-04-2007 om 16:40 schreef Frans Pop:
On Saturday 21 April 2007 09:13, Geert Stappers wrote:
When is libc 2.5 expected to arrive?
http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?p=glibc
It did arrive:-)
Cheers
Geert Stappers
( telling the readers of the list archive that it
-Original Message-
From: Geert Stappers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 April 2007 22:15
To: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: nano-udeb: Depends: libc6 (= 2.5)
Op 21-04-2007 om 16:40 schreef Frans Pop:
On Saturday 21 April 2007 09:13, Geert Stappers wrote:
When
Accepted:
linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.04.dsc
to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6/linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.04.dsc
linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.04.tar.gz
to
pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6/linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6_1.04.tar.gz
Accepted:
linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.04.dsc
to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-i386-2.6/linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.04.dsc
linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.04.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-i386-2.6/linux-modules-di-i386-2.6_1.04.tar.gz
loop-aes-modules-2.6.20-1-486-di_1.04_i386.udeb
to
Accepted:
acpi-modules-2.6.20-1-486-di_1.46_i386.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/acpi-modules-2.6.20-1-486-di_1.46_i386.udeb
ata-modules-2.6.20-1-486-di_1.46_i386.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/ata-modules-2.6.20-1-486-di_1.46_i386.udeb
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 23:51, peter green wrote:
unfortunately it still seems to be backed up out of testing by a
missing build-dep on gcc-4.2 :)
I would not expect testing to be really usable to build the installer for
quite some time.
pgp0d5VLcAtGN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 05:14:09PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Frans already asked most of the questions that I had. A few others:
Is anybody else using grub2 as a default bootloader today?
Not yet.
Just an entry point, which may or may not
49 matches
Mail list logo
