Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
> We're now in July, so it's time for our team of magic reviewers to
> work on June 2010 archives.
>
> More details on http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/SpamClean
>
> Please note that last month saw a discussion about whether it's good
> or not
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
> > bubu...@mykerinos:~/src/debian/debian-installer/installer/build/needed-c
> >haracters> LC_ALL=C svn add s...@latin svn: warning: 'sr' not found
> > bubu...@mykerinos:~/src/debian/debian-installer/installer/build/needed-c
> >haracters> LC_ALL=C svn add s..
On Sun, 2010 Jul 18 06:09+0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>
> No. Those are *not* daily built images. Follow the relevant links from
> the page I referred to! For netboot you need "other images".
Oh, right---I see the different set of links, that go to various places
(e.g. people.debian.org) not in the rep
On Sunday 18 July 2010, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
> So if I had used the one from
> http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/sid/main/installer-amd64/current/
>images/netboot/
>
> it would have worked?
No. Those are *not* daily built images. Follow the relevant links from the
page I referred to! For
On Sun, 2010 Jul 18 04:46+0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>
> No, that's no update. Only a date change for some reason. The images
> are still identical to the alpha1 release from February. One way to
> see that is to check the kernel version: it uses 2.6.30 instead of
> 2.6.32. Another is to check the /etc
On Sunday 18 July 2010, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
> On Sat, 2010 Jul 17 21:40+0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > I'm not sure what image was used by the bug reporter, but I assume a
> > current "D-I alpha 1" image. The alpha1 images date from mid Februari.
>
> These received a refresh a few days ago:
> http
On Sat, 2010 Jul 17 21:40+0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>
> I'm not sure what image was used by the bug reporter, but I assume a
> current "D-I alpha 1" image. The alpha1 images date from mid Februari.
These received a refresh a few days ago:
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/squeeze/main/inst
Package: live-installer-launcher
When using live-installer-launcher and d-i can't find a installer medium
and you go back to the main menu, the 'Abort the installation' item
doesn't work.
I guess this is something similar as with the 'Exit' item we had and
which was fixed in main-menu 1.30 and ro
w
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c422f20.458bf...@unisys.com
03w
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c422f8a.f7f2f...@diamondv.com
(Daniel: sorry for the private duplicate of this mail; no need to CC me.)
On Saturday 17 July 2010, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
> On Sat, 2010 Jul 17 13:35+0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > So: as the reported issue is already fixed in current daily built D-I
> > images and as the Recommends in popcon is fu
On Sat, 2010 Jul 17 13:35+0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>
> So: as the reported issue is already fixed in current daily built D-I
> images and as the Recommends in popcon is functionally correct, there
> is absolutely zero need to make any changes in popcon.
Okay, now I'm a little confused.
So I see in
On Saturday 17 July 2010, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> I need to add such a file, but "svn add" apparently chokes on it:
>
> bubu...@mykerinos:~/src/debian/debian-installer/installer/build/needed-c
>haracters> LC_ALL=C svn add s...@latin svn: warning: 'sr' not found
> bubu...@mykerinos:~/src/debian/d
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2010 18:58:21 +0100
with message-id <20100717175821.gf12...@riva.ucam.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#589379: Unable to install Ubuntu because old LVM
pvolume appear after automatic partitioning
has caused the Debian Bug report #589379,
regarding Unable to install Ubu
I need to add such a file, but "svn add" apparently chokes on it:
bubu...@mykerinos:~/src/debian/debian-installer/installer/build/needed-characters>
LC_ALL=C svn add s...@latin
svn: warning: 'sr' not found
bubu...@mykerinos:~/src/debian/debian-installer/installer/build/needed-characters>
LC_ALL=
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 589404 xserver-xorg
Bug #589404 [installation-reports] installation-reports: Squeeze fails to
configure monitor
Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'xserver-xorg'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me i
reassign 589404 xserver-xorg
thanks
Quoting Chris Barnard (cb...@westnet.com.au):
> Comments/Problems:
> Failed to configure display to 1440 x 900. Config was 4 x 3 aspect ratio;
> sorry I don't remember exactly which numbers. I was
> surprised because Lenny gets it right with no problems and
FYI: The status of the partman-md source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 49
Current version: 52
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later
FYI: The status of the partman-ext3 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 58
Current version: 60
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
late
FYI: The status of the partman-lvm source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 68
Current version: 71
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later
FYI: The status of the partman-jfs source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 30
Current version: 31
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later
FYI: The status of the partman-basicmethods source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 43
Current version: 45
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will rece
FYI: The status of the partman-efi source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 20
Current version: 21
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later
FYI: The status of the partman-crypto source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 40
Current version: 44
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
la
FYI: The status of the partman-basicfilesystems source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 63
Current version: 64
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will
FYI: The status of the partman-auto-raid source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 15
Current version: 16
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
FYI: The status of the partman-base source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 140
Current version: 142
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
la
FYI: The status of the partman-auto-lvm source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 33
Current version: 35
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
FYI: The status of the partman-auto-crypto source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 12
Current version: 14
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will recei
FYI: The status of the partman-auto source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 89
Current version: 92
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
late
Package: installation-reports
Severity: important
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: netinst
Image version: netinst iso from 14 jul 10 to within a day or 2
Date:
Machine: White box; VIA KT266/A mobo:Athlon 2000 :Nvidia MX4000: LG Flatron
W1942T monitor
Partitions:
Base System Installa
Hi,
Philip Hands wrote:.
> > BTW, is there any reason why not install Etch from floppy instead of
> > Sarge?
>
> No, none -- I thought I'd checked that. Actually, I think what actually
> happened is that I found the sarge link first, checked for etch, found
> it and then must have pasted the wr
Accepted:
s390-netdevice_0.0.23.dsc
to main/s/s390-netdevice/s390-netdevice_0.0.23.dsc
s390-netdevice_0.0.23.tar.gz
to main/s/s390-netdevice/s390-netdevice_0.0.23.tar.gz
s390-netdevice_0.0.23_s390.udeb
to main/s/s390-netdevice/s390-netdevice_0.0.23_s390.udeb
Override entries for your pac
Accepted:
s390-dasd_0.0.26.dsc
to main/s/s390-dasd/s390-dasd_0.0.26.dsc
s390-dasd_0.0.26.tar.gz
to main/s/s390-dasd/s390-dasd_0.0.26.tar.gz
s390-dasd_0.0.26_s390.udeb
to main/s/s390-dasd/s390-dasd_0.0.26_s390.udeb
Override entries for your package:
s390-dasd_0.0.26.dsc - source debian-in
On Saturday 17 July 2010, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> I eagerly await Bills view on the proposed change for
> popularity-contest, which I believe i a better place to implement the
> change.
No, it is not reasonable to ask packages to change functionally correct and
policy-compliant dependencies
s390-netdevice_0.0.23_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
s390-netdevice_0.0.23.dsc
s390-netdevice_0.0.23.tar.gz
s390-netdevice_0.0.23_s390.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
s390-dasd_0.0.26_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
s390-dasd_0.0.26.dsc
s390-dasd_0.0.26.tar.gz
s390-dasd_0.0.26_s390.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@l
[Daniel Richard G.]
> Yes, I see that... what is it now, the --no-recommends switch is broken?
Nope. Your installation simply used version 0.26, which is one
version before the change was introduced.
I eagerly await Bills view on the proposed change for
popularity-contest, which I believe i a be
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2010 10:46:15 +0200
with message-id <201007171046.16291.elen...@planet.nl>
and subject line Re: Bug#589213: Do not install Exim in minimal system
has caused the Debian Bug report #589213,
regarding Do not install Exim in minimal system
to be marked as done.
This mean
On Sat, 2010 Jul 17 09:56+0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> The obvious fix is to change popularity-contest to suggest instead of
> recommend, to avoid pulling in a MTA when popularity-contest is
> installed. Cc to the maintainer list to see if that is an interesting
> alternative.
Hunh. I was
Package: debian-installer? partman-* ? don't know
Version: Ubuntu 10.04 installer.
I send this bug-report to you, as the partman-auto package maintained
by debian bug tracker (https://launchpad.net/partman-auto)
I Unable to install Ubuntu 10.04 server because old LVM pvolume appear
after automati
[Daniel Richard G.]
> Of course; it is attached.
>
> Looking at that, it doesn't appear that cron is responsible for pulling
> in exim4*; cron is installed much earlier in the process. heirloom-mailx
> is installed at the same time as exim4*, but that one only Suggests:
> exim4. It seems possible
Now that l10n updates and uploads happened in preparation of Debian
Installer squeeze beta 1 release, I could add two new packages to the
list of packages which templates are aggregated together in Debian
Installer PO files: partmand-btrfs and partman-ufs
These packages' strings are very similar t
Quoting Vagrant Cascadian (vagr...@freegeek.org):
> here's the diff for the uploaded NMU:
Thanks. It's committed to SVN now.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
44 matches
Mail list logo
