On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 06:24:46PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
At this point, I'm tempted to add a check to the for loop that starts on
line 650 in the current HEAD (commit 062ddbcb66150) for something along
the lines of:
if [ ! -b $bootdev ]; then
# jump to the next loop iteration
grub-installer_1.84_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
grub-installer_1.84.dsc
grub-installer_1.84.tar.gz
grub-installer_1.84_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2012 16:47:29 +
with message-id e1tkhnb-0001sa...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#651720: fixed in grub-installer 1.84
has caused the Debian Bug report #651720,
regarding new ZFS installs completely broken in Wheezy/Sid
to be marked as done.
This means
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 17:28:47 +0100
Source: grub-installer
Binary: grub-installer
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.84
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Forwarded Message
From: Andreas Glaeser bugs.andreas.glae...@freenet.de
To: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
Subject: Re: Bug#694344: installation-report: Wheezy beta set up on FSC Futro
S400
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 14:53:40 +0100
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 01:33:23 +0100
Ben
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
First there were intermittent bootproblems, then more often and finally the box
would not
boot anymore at all. I tried all kinds of BIOS-settings changes, but could not
resolve
the situation, began to feel desperate already.
Then I installed the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 694344 important
Bug #694344 [installation-reports] installation-report: Wheezy beta set up on
FSC Futro S400
Severity set to 'important' from 'wishlist'
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 19:21 +0100, Andreas Glaeser wrote:
First there were intermittent bootproblems, then more often and finally the
box would not
boot anymore at all. I tried all kinds of BIOS-settings changes, but could
not resolve
the situation, began to feel desperate already.
Then I
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# duplicate behavior
merge 606268 682608
Bug #606268 [network-manager] Network interface used for installation is
configured as unmanaged by NM
Bug #609072 [network-manager] Network interface used for installation is
configured as unmanaged by
Package: partman-base
Version: 162
Severity: wishlist
parted 3.x removes most of the ped_file_system_* entry points that
required extensive copies of file system code in libparted, with the
exception of some limited support for HFS+ and FAT resizing (see its
NEWS file for more details; facilities
Subject: installation-reports: The installer, when finished, ejects the optical
disk. This is unhelpful and annoying, especially if you are installing from an
.iso image into a virtual machine, and wish to install packages from the disk
after the install (and APT sources.list defaults to an
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 646130 with 696123
Bug #646130 [parted] parted versions lags behind
Bug #665465 [parted] Please upgrade parted to new upstream release
646130 was not blocked by any bugs.
646130 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 646130:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm confused. My understanding is that partman was already using
external utilities for everything besides fat, hfs, and ext2 resize,
and that there were already bug reports covering the lack of progress
indication with those. Parted3 appears to
On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 00:11 +, Colin Watson wrote:
[...]
Rather than the Sisyphean task of giving all the appropriate utilities
machine-parseable progress interface, I instead suggest that we study
the current progress interfaces and try to identify some common factors
that can be parsed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have trouble believing that this is going to be easier than
patching the most common utilities to add an option for a
machine-readable progress indicator.
Not too long ago I was looking at patching gparted to support this and
while it did not
Package: installation-reports
Attempting to install wheezy i386 XFCE weekly build on Dell Optiplex
755 fails at Detect and mount CD-ROM with No common CD-ROM drive
was detected. Most recent weekly build tried is 2012/11/12 (XFCE).
The installer can successfully check the CD-ROM's integrity.
16 matches
Mail list logo
