Chris Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Joey Hess wrote:
>
>> If so, jusr db_progress STEP 1 <&4 should work just as well and less
>> messily, like in my patch.
>
> Your patch works. Please disregard mine.. many thanks.
Joey, could you please commit it?
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O
Joey Hess wrote:
> If so, jusr db_progress STEP 1 <&4 should work just as well and less
> messily, like in my patch.
Your patch works. Please disregard mine.. many thanks.
Regards,
--
Chris Lamb, UK [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chris Lamb wrote:
> tags 486926 + patch
> thanks
>
> Chris Lamb wrote:
>
> > I tried a few fd/fifo redirection tricks, but couldn't get the right
> > combination..any ideas?
>
> Got it, hurrah. Updated and tested patch attached.
Huh, it looks like I was at least on the right track with my patch
Chris Lamb wrote:
> That fixes that problem, but now the read command started by "db_progress
> STEP 1" is reading a filename instead of the the STEP value, resulting in
> "Invalid value: ./bin/", and the installation failing.
>
> I tried a few fd/fifo redirection tricks, but couldn't get the righ
tags 486926 + patch
thanks
Chris Lamb wrote:
> I tried a few fd/fifo redirection tricks, but couldn't get the right
> combination..any ideas?
Got it, hurrah. Updated and tested patch attached.
Regards,
--
Chris Lamb, UK [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joey Hess wrote:
> > something seems to block the filename output from tar, causing the
> > progress bar to sit at 2% until very near the end - it then shoots up
> > quite quickly.
>
> Right, I guess I'd need to use a read loop to get the lines one at a
> time rather than having it buffer. Upda
Joey Hess wrote:
>> As a bonus, before reading your reply I had re-implemented this
>> functionality in C which sped it up by a factor of 4 - using tar seems to
>> have the same effect.
>
> Using C is an interesting idea..
yes. using tar from the live-system would be unfortunate, as it highers
th
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Just tried it here. Whilst the files are copied with the correct permissions
> (yay), something seems to block the filename output from tar, causing the
> progress bar to sit at 2% until very near the end - it then shoots up quite
> quickly.
Right, I guess I'd need to use a rea
Joey Hess wrote:
> The thing to do seems to be to use tar instead.
>
> I cannot test the attached patch easily, since I have no live CDs to use
> it with.
Just tried it here. Whilst the files are copied with the correct permissions
(yay), something seems to block the filename output from tar, ca
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Package: live-installer
> Severity: normal
> Version: 5
>
> After installation via live-installer, permisions on directories are all
> 0755. This is especially noticable on /tmp, /var/mail, /etc/ssl/private, etc.
If that's the case, the bug should probably be RC; a system with
Package: live-installer
Severity: normal
Version: 5
After installation via live-installer, permisions on directories are all
0755. This is especially noticable on /tmp, /var/mail, /etc/ssl/private, etc.
Regards,
--
Chris Lamb, UK [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11 matches
Mail list logo
