Package: console-setup
Version: 1.50
Severity: normal
Hi (again)!
During the discussions for bug #546983, console-setup was greatly
improved by Anton Zinoviev (which I would like to thank again):
the console is now able to display 'toilet -f future' symbols in a
strange, yet charming way, by usin
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 05:35:38PM +0100, Francesco Poli (t1000) wrote:
>
> OK, after that, I start an X session:
>
> $ startx & logout
>
> If I switch back to the console (by pressing [Ctrl+Alt+F1]) and I login
> again, then the output of
>
> $ toilet -f future hello
> ╻ ╻┏━╸╻ ╻ ┏━┓
>
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:19:55 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 05:35:38PM +0100, Francesco Poli (t1000) wrote:
[...]
> > If I switch back to the console (by pressing [Ctrl+Alt+F1]) and I login
> > again, then the output of
> >
> > $ toilet -f future hello
[...]
> > looks dif
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 08:08:12PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
>
> No, I cannot: this command belongs to the kbd package, but I do not
> have this package installed on any of the Debian boxes I use.
>
> Should I switch from console-tools to kbd, in your opinion?
Console-tools has several bugs t
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:02:53 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 08:08:12PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> >
> > No, I cannot: this command belongs to the kbd package, but I do not
> > have this package installed on any of the Debian boxes I use.
> >
> > Should I switch from co
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:01:38PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > The equivalent command is 'showcfont' but it doesn't work on my machine
> > (outdated version of Debian unstable).
>
> I had tried with 'showcfont', but I thought it didn't do what you
> wanted. Instead of telling me the name of
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:45:35 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:01:38PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > I had tried with 'showcfont', but I thought it didn't do what you
> > wanted. Instead of telling me the name of the used font (as I
> > expected), it wrote a comple
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 23:49:36 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:45:35 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:01:38PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> >
> > > > I suppose that only the horizontal lines are broken (the vertical
> > > > are OK)?
> > >
>
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 06:40:25PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> >
> > Hence, it seems that this bug should be fixed in
> > xserver-xorg-video-intel. If this is the case, I think the bug report
> > should be reassigned to package xserver-xorg-video-intel, version
> > 2:2.9.1-1 .
>
> Do you want
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:07:55 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 06:40:25PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > >
> > > Hence, it seems that this bug should be fixed in
> > > xserver-xorg-video-intel. If this is the case, I think the bug report
> > > should be reassigned to package
reassign 561008 xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.9.1-1
thank you
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 12:24:14PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
>
> I have just performed the test you requested, and I can confirm that
> lat1u-16.psf.gz is OK (without X).
Then I am reassigning to xserver-xorg-video-intel.
Anton Zino
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 561008 xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.9.1-1
Bug #561008 [console-setup] console-setup: approximations for 'toilet -f
future' symbols look different before and after X
Bug reassigned from package 'console-setup' to 'xserver-xorg-video-intel
12 matches
Mail list logo