On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 08:24:09AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> I believe you have misread the policy. As far as I know, it says that
> one packages maintainer scripts should not modify another packages
> configuration files.
I based the comment on a mail from Konstantinos I recently re
[Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña]
> Just a note. Your links configuration (as the lynx one I have sent
> to the BTS) modifies _another_ conffile (/etc/links.cfg in the links
> case). This is a policy violation (a package cannot modify another's
> package configuration file automatically).
I believe
On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 01:21:52PM +0300, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> > > > - /etc/inputrc is not modified (need to use non-ASCII
> > > > characteres in console)
> > >
> > > I don't know about that I had the impression that it's configured
> > > elsewhere.
>
> Ok, after a short discussion on
Kenshi Muto wrote:
> FYI, localization-config and relational packages add +5.5MB to netinst.
And that's a big problem because with 5.5 mb more the netinst will
overflow 128 mb usb keychains with hd-media.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
At 7 Sep 04 07:10:09 GMT,
Kenshi Muto wrote:
> At 7 Sep 04 06:48:16 GMT,
> Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > > But perl, libapt-pkg-perl and libconfig-inifiles-perl aren't ready on
> > > 2nd stage. (IMHO apt-install them is bad idea because perl-base is
> > > already installed.)
> >
> > What do
At 7 Sep 04 06:48:16 GMT,
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > But perl, libapt-pkg-perl and libconfig-inifiles-perl aren't ready on
> > 2nd stage. (IMHO apt-install them is bad idea because perl-base is
> > already installed.)
>
> What do you mean here? Are these packages missing on the CD? Why is
>
[Kenshi Muto]
> But perl, libapt-pkg-perl and libconfig-inifiles-perl aren't ready on
> 2nd stage. (IMHO apt-install them is bad idea because perl-base is
> already installed.)
What do you mean here? Are these packages missing on the CD? Why is
the fact that perl-base is already installed making
Hi,
At 31 Aug 04 16:52:18 GMT,
Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> I strongly believe that l-c has come to a point that is almost
> production-ready (reasons are given below) and can be included in
> Debian.
> It has been uploaded today to the Debian archive so that anyone can
> test.
That's
On ÎÎÏ 06 ÎÎÏ 2004 10:14, Javier FernÃndez-Sanguino PeÃa wrote:
> You mean install time here I guess
yes my mistake.
> There are several situations which might cam around that make it
> useful being in localization-config:
>
> 1.- The sysadmin has not defined a language on installation and
[Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña]
> for example, a Norwegian school system that is going to be used only
> by Norwegian users which will probably not change their language to
> 'fr' :-)
Actually, such school might want to keep 'fr', as the French teacher
want all pupils to switch to french GUI at t
On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 02:40:38AM +0300, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> (CCing d-boot as I want to make sure I have not misunderstood
> anything)
[ Maybe d-i18n is a more appropiate forum, I will not add it to CC: however ]
> > - /etc/environment is not modified
>
> this is not supposed to b
(CCing d-boot as I want to make sure I have not misunderstood
anything)
On ÎÎÏ 06 ÎÎÏ 2004 01:00, Javier FernÃndez-Sanguino PeÃa wrote:
> Ah, I see, I thought there was one script per language but,
> actually, you execute the $release script with the language as a
> parameter.
Yes, it's better t
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 07:52:18PM +0300, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
> I strongly believe that l-c has come to a point that is almost
> production-ready (reasons are given below) and can be included in
> Debian.
I still have to r
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 07:52:18PM +0300, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
> I strongly believe that l-c has come to a point that is almost
> production-ready (reasons are given below) and can be included in
> Debian.
> It has been upl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I strongly believe that l-c has come to a point that is almost
production-ready (reasons are given below) and can be included in
Debian.
It has been uploaded today to the Debian archive so that anyone can
test.
Debconf preseeding works as
15 matches
Mail list logo
