Re: frame-buffer on vanilla?

2002-04-11 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include Adam Di Carlo wrote on Thu Apr 11, 2002 um 01:51:10AM: > Eduard, there's no point in debating this on this list. kernel-image > changes must be approved by the maintainer of that package. Whether > the changed package (and i386 b-f rebuild) is accepted in woody is up > to the release

Re: frame-buffer on vanilla?

2002-04-10 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include Matt Zimmerman wrote on Mon Apr 08, 2002 um 02:08:53PM: > > > What part of that don't you understand? > > > > The "wtf no without any GOOD reasons" part. > > "We want to actually make a release" is good enough reason for me. Me too, and there is no reason why the change would hold up

Re: frame-buffer on vanilla?

2002-04-08 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 02:36:35PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: > Anthony Towns wrote on Sat Apr 06, 2002 um 10:14:16PM: > > Eduard, _no_. > > > > What part of that don't you understand? > > The "wtf no without any GOOD reasons" part. "We want to actually make a release" is good enough reason fo

Re: frame-buffer on vanilla?

2002-04-06 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include Anthony Towns wrote on Sat Apr 06, 2002 um 10:14:16PM: > On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 02:08:25PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: > > > Actually it won't be since vga16 is only modularised in 2.4. > > Okay, let's make a summary (+ is pro, - is contra): > > Eduard, _no_. > > What part of that don'

Re: frame-buffer on vanilla?

2002-04-06 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include Herbert Xu wrote on Sat Apr 06, 2002 um 08:53:49PM: > > Enabling VGA16 as a module will be done in the next release. > > Actually it won't be since vga16 is only modularised in 2.4. Okay, let's make a summary (+ is pro, - is contra): - vanilla (2.2.20) + known as stable - no f

Re: frame-buffer on vanilla?

2002-04-06 Thread Herbert Xu
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Enabling VGA16 as a module will be done in the next release. Actually it won't be since vga16 is only modularised in 2.4. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor

Re: frame-buffer on vanilla? (was: Re: 2.4 kernel as default boot kernel on CD #1 ??)

2002-04-05 Thread Herbert Xu
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 10:31:25PM -0800, David Kimdon wrote: > > the first CD. Is enabling frame-buffer an option on the vanilla > flavor? (Herbert, I cc'd you to get your opinion on that, I don't Enabling VGA16 as a module will be done in the next release. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( h

frame-buffer on vanilla? (was: Re: 2.4 kernel as default boot kernel on CD #1 ??)

2002-04-05 Thread David Kimdon
Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 05:17:57AM +0200 wrote: > On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 04:06:19AM +0100, Philip Hands wrote: > > > > > cd1: idepci; cd2 scsi; cd3: bf2.4; cd4: vanilla > > > I got a second, any opposed? > > After considering this, I'm opposed. > > If the decision is that the default boot floppies f