Re: i18n and libnewt?

2001-12-08 Thread Philip Blundell
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Adam Di Carlo writes: >Hmm, ok, so installing libnewt-utf8_pic.a would be totally useless? I think so, yeah. >Regarding slang, are we in the same boat? Do they have the same >soname? Removing all slang*-pic packages is not an option because it >makes the image n

Re: i18n and libnewt?

2001-12-07 Thread Phil Blundell
>How can you be sure we're not doing reduction? After all, 'make >check' in i18n mode demands libnewt-utf8-pic is installed. Yah, but libnewt-utf8-pic installs as /usr/lib/libnewt-utf8_pic.a, whereas mklibs.py will be looking for a libnewt_pic.a (since libnewt-utf8's soname is still libnewt.so.0

Re: i18n and libnewt?

2001-12-06 Thread Philip Blundell
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Adam Di Carlo writes: >Philip Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Finally, we could just make sure that the versions of newt and slang that end >> up on single-locale boot floppies are the non-UTF8 ones. This seems like the >> most attractive proposition righ