On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 11:45:58PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Control: tags 1067115 + patch
> Control: tags 1067115 + pending
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for gross (versioned as 1.0.2-4.1) and uploaded
> it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it.
>
Th
On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 09:59:53PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Hi Antonio!
>
> On 2023-09-10 15:57:58 [+0200], Antonio Radici wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 01:38:33PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > Hi Antonio,
> > >
> > &g
On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 01:47:30PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Antonio,
>
> On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 01:24:10PM +0200, Antonio Radici wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 01:05:31PM +0200, Antonio Radici wrote:
> > > Thanks for raising this, I'm uploading th
On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 01:38:33PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Antonio,
>
> FWIW, I have done the bookworm-security upload already to
> security-master, and still working on the bullseye-security one (with
> plan to release the DSA tonight ideally).
Ack, thanks for the update, I assum
On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 01:05:31PM +0200, Antonio Radici wrote:
> Thanks for raising this, I'm uploading the new packages with the fixes today.
apparently someone else did a NMU with the new version and incorrectly closed
the bug.
I reopened the bug because stable needs to be addressed
On Sat, Sep 09, 2023 at 10:23:32PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Source: mutt
> Version: 2.2.9-1
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security upstream
> Justification: user security hole
> X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
>
>
> Hi,
>
> The following vulnerabilities were publis
On Sun, Aug 13, 2023 at 10:31:45AM -0300, Carlos Henrique Lima Melara wrote:
> Hi, Pino.
>
> I'm sending this email to you (cc #1038270 and samueloph) because I
> would like to help maintaining neomutt. I use it everyday and I've
> interacted with the upstream a couple times - he's a very nice per
On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 10:17:19PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Antonio,
>
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 09:59:18PM +0100, Antonio Radici wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 10:05:14PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > Hi Antonio,
> > >
> > >
On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 10:05:14PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Antonio,
>
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 09:38:39AM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> > Note this was fixed in Mutt 2.2.8. See
> > https://gitlab.com/muttmua/mutt/-/issues/428 for the Mutt bug report.
> >
> > This important f
On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 08:16:30PM +0200, Vincent-Xavier JUMEL wrote:
> https://github.com/neomutt/neomutt/pull/3524 closes
> https://github.com/neomutt/neomutt/issues/3514
> so neomutt could be updated with the latest master to reenable back sasl
> support via GNU SASL
Thanks for the update, I'll
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 11:46:09AM +0200, Michael Prokop wrote:
> Package: neomutt
> Version: 20211029+dfsg1-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hi,
>
> NeoMutt versions 2022-04-08, 2022-04-15 + 2022-04-29 got released
> since the latest upload on 2021-12-11, would be nice to have a
> recent version in De
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 09:18:23AM +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is to state that after 21 days, I've uploaded postgrey to
> DELAYED/7, as documented in the salvaging procedure.
Hi Jordi,
thanks for that. I was wondering if you are interested in taking it over?
Otherwise I will likel
Control: tag -1 -moreinfo
Control: tag -1 +unreproducible
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 02:36:18PM +0100, Bastian Germann wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 07:45:57 +0100 Antonio Radici wrote:
> > I had zero time to work on cfengine3 and I'm going to orphan it, I see that
> > there was an ITA but no upload, now Bastian has taken over the ITA, i
Control: tags 979020 +pending
On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 02:30:33PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Sat, Jan 02, 2021 at 10:13:09AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> >
> > Recently I have split the `mime-support` package into two: `media-types`
> > supplies /etc/mime.types and `mailcap` supplies t
Hello folks,
what's the status on this bug?
I had zero time to work on cfengine3 and I'm going to orphan it, I see that
there was an ITA but no upload, now Bastian has taken over the ITA, is there
any plan here?
Thanks!
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 12:36:07PM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 08:45:47PM +0100, Hannes von Haugwitz wrote:
> > Is there any progress with this bug?
>
> Mutt 2.1.3 included the corrected sort commit referenced in my last email.
> So, for unstable/testing it would be n
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 10:20:17AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Package: mutt
> Version: 2.0.5-4.1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: causes non-serious data loss
>
> Mutt 2.1.2 is available. From the announce: "This is an important
> bug-fix release, fixing a potential data-loss IMAP bug. IMAP
/changelog 2021-03-20 17:26:12.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+mutt (2.0.5-4) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * debian/patches:
++ upstream/985152-body-color-slowness.patch: fixes slowness (up to tens of
+ seconds) if body coloring is present (Closes: 985152).
+
+ -- Antonio Radici Sat, 20
On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 09:47:34AM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Hello Antonio,
> as announced the German mutt translation was heavily improved over the
> course of the last weeks[1]. Since the freeze is now approaching and due
> to "real life" for key people involved in the review, we did not
>
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 10:31:54AM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 08:47:01PM +0100, Antonio Radici wrote:
> > Thanks for the patch, I will upgrade to the latest upstream version by
> > Sunday
> > this week
>
> Antonio, if it helps, I can try
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 09:07:37AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Control: tags 980326 + patch
> Control: tags 980326 + pending
>
> Hi Antonio,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for mutt (versioned as 2.0.2-1.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it long
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the cfengine3 package.
I haven't been using the package in a while and I don't believe I can be
effective maintaining it due to that.
The package description is:
Cfengine is a suite of programs for integrated autonomic management
of eithe
0716+dfsg.1-1+deb10u2) buster; urgency=medium
+
+ * debian/patches:
++ security/CVE-2020-28896.patch: handle the relevant CVE to stop sending
+ login information over an encrypted connections in certain conditions.
+
+ -- Antonio Radici Tue, 24 Nov 2020 07:55:28 +0100
+
neomutt (201807
og
--- mutt-1.10.1/debian/changelog2020-07-02 16:45:23.0 +0200
+++ mutt-1.10.1/debian/changelog2020-11-23 09:26:09.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+mutt (1.10.1-2.1+deb10u4) buster; urgency=medium
+
+ * debian/patches:
++ fix for CVE-2020-28896 located in security/CVE-2020
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 12:07:01PM -0800, Benjamin Mako Hill wrote:
> Package: neomutt
> Version: 20200626+dfsg.1-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Greetings!
>
> Thank you for maintaining neomutt! There was a new release of neomutt in late
> September that I suppose should be uploaded into Debian. It's
Control: tag -1 +pending
Thanks for the patch, I've pushed it to git, it will be in the next upload.
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 09:54:19AM +0200, Gian Piero Carrubba wrote:
> Package: cfengine3
> Followup-For: Bug #963341
>
> Hi,
>
> just a friendly ping that
> https://salsa.debian.org/cfengine-team/cfengine3/-/merge_requests/2
> fixes this (admittely also includes not strictly needed changes, tho)
On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 05:50:39PM +0900, Benjamin Poirier wrote:
> This triggered a regression, I would say.
>
> When composing a new message, the realname configuration item is not
> taken into account to create the "From" address. For example, in my
> case, it appears as "From: benjamin.poir...
IMAP preauth in SSH tunnels (Closes: 963970)
+
+ -- Antonio Radici Thu, 02 Jul 2020 16:45:23 +0200
+
mutt (1.10.1-2.1+deb10u2) buster-security; urgency=high
* debian/patches:
diff -Nru mutt-1.10.1/debian/patches/series mutt-1.10.1/debian/patches/series
--- mutt-1.10.1/debian/patches/series
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 02:29:16PM +0200, Jarek Kamiński wrote:
> Package: mutt
> Version: 1.10.1-2.1+deb10u2
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> I've mutt configured to exec Dovecot imap server directly with the
> following setting in /etc/Muttrc:
> #v+
> account-hook imap://[...] 'set tunnel="/usr/l
Control: found -1 1.14.4-2
Control: tag -1 +confirmed +upstream
Control: forwarded -1 https://gitlab.com/muttmua/mutt/-/issues/259
Still reproducible. Forwarded upstream.
Control: severity -1 wishlist
In reality this is working as intended, tag-prefix only applies ot the first
command, as per documentation.
I'll classify it as wishlist, but I might close it as wontfix if we don't get
traction upstream.
Control: found -1 1.14.4-2
Control: tag -1 +upstream +confirmed
Control: forwarded -1 https://gitlab.com/muttmua/mutt/-/issues/258
Forwarded upstream again.
Control: tag -1 -pending
Control: forwarded -1 https://gitlab.com/muttmua/mutt/-/issues/257
Control: tag -1 +upstream
Let's try again some years later, I've forwarded it upstream, ideally they will
include the patch rather than me.
Control: tag -1 +upstream +confirmed
Control: found -1 1.14.4-2
Control: forwarded -1 https://gitlab.com/muttmua/mutt/-/issues/256
Went to upstream, if he fixes it it will be the oldest Debian bug ever fixed :D
Control: tag -1 +confirmed +upstream
Control: forwarded -1 https://gitlab.com/muttmua/mutt/-/issues/255
Control: found -1 1.14.4-2
Still there, forwarded upstream.
Control: found -1 1.14.4-2
Control: tag -1 +upstream +confirmed
Control: forwarded -1 https://gitlab.com/muttmua/mutt/-/issues/254
On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 01:44:11PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Please try with an inlined signed message, not a mime signed
> message. I can still reproduce this with
Control: forwarded -1 https://gitlab.com/muttmua/mutt/-/issues/253
Control: tag -1 +confirmed +upstream
Control: found -1 1.14.4-2
Old bug but still exists, forwarded upstream.
Control: found -1 1.14.4-2
Control: tag -1 +upstream
Control: forwarded -1 https://gitlab.com/muttmua/mutt/-/issues/252
On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 11:34:34AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Package: mutt
> Version: 1.5.24-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Given a tunnel set with 'set tunnel=...', mutt appears
Control: tag -1 +moreinfo
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 06:07:49PM -0700, Bill Brelsford wrote:
> Package: mutt
> Version: 1.5.24-1+b1
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> After displaying a text/plain attachment (via autoview) with a
> mailcap file containing
>
> text/plain; myprog %s; test
Control: tag -1 +pending
Added in git, will be uploaded with the next version.
Control: tag -1 +moreinfo
Can you provide an example configuration that allow us to reproduce this bug
against the version that is currently on sid?
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 03:03:06PM +, Joseph Nahmias wrote:
> Package: mutt
> Version: 1.10.1-2.1+deb10u2
> Followup-For: Bug #963107
>
> Hello,
>
> I can confirm that this bug bit me as well, and that the listed mitigation
> fixed the problem. Will the upstream fix be backported to Debian
>
On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 02:23:52PM -0600, Michael Berg wrote:
>
> First, thank you for packaging cfengine 3.15.2.
>
> Unfortunately, the new cfengine 3.15.2 package in sid/unstable is
> broken and non-functional.
Thanks for the report, I'll look into it tomorrow.
Control: tag -1 +moreinfo
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 02:45:07PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Package: mutt
> Version: 1.5.19-4
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> When copying or moving/saving messages mutt adds Lines and
> Content-Length headers. This is necessary for certain mbox formats,
> be
Control: tag -1 +moreinfo
Can you give me a way to reproduce this? Which query-command are you using?
maybe provide an example or reproducible muttrc?
Control: tag -1 +pending
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 01:15:51AM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Source: mutt
> Version: 1.10.1-2.1
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
> User: help-lib...@gnu.org
> Usertags: libidn2
>
> Hi,
>
> Currently mutt uses libidn but also supports libidn2.
>
> libidn2 is a
Control: tag -1 +moreinfo
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 10:15:21PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Package: mutt
> Version: 1.5.21-5+b1
> Severity: important
>
> When viewing a message with attachments, 'v' to view attachment
> list allows me to select the attachment and '' typically
> views it. This
Control: tag -1 +moreinfo
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 04:40:22AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> Package: mutt
> Version: 1.7.2-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi!
> I just tried to attach a patch to a mail. The patch looks fine:
>
> [/tmp]$ file ohw.debdiff
> ohw.debdiff: unified diff output, UTF-8 Unicod
Control: tag -1 +moreinfo
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 04:24:29PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> Package: mutt
> Version: 1.7.2-1+deb9u1
> Severity: important
>
> When saving an attachment from into a directory on a CIFS share
> (Windows 2012R2 server), mutt creates an empty file and then fails
>
Control: tag -1 +moreinfo
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 09:49:22AM +0200, Samuel Hym wrote:
> Hi Antonio,
>
> Yes, this was happening with mutt/1.6.?. I’ve run into those problems
> before mutt/1.7, with mutt packages from unstable. I didn’t try with
> older mutts, I wrote those macros only in August.
Control: tag -1 +moreinfo
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 12:26:17PM +0100, Nicolas Évrard wrote:
> Package: mutt
> Version: 1.7.1-5
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I have the following virtual mailbox defined:
>
> virtual-mailboxes Inbox "notmuch://?query=tag:inbox"
>
> This is the pr
Control: severity -1 wishlist
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 07:54:08AM +0200, Nomen Nescio wrote:
> Package: mutt
> Version: 1.5.23-3
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> MIME-compliant messages containing images that are referenced by an
> HTML attachment do not render with the images because
Control: reassign -1 mutt
Control: tag -1 +moreinfo
On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 10:28:51PM -0700, Carbonated Beverage wrote:
> Package: mutt-patched
> Version: 1.6.0-1
> Severity: important
>
>* What led up to the situation?
>
> Using the attached example .muttrc (sanitized) reproduces the
Control: tag -1 +moreinfo
Is this reproducible in mutt (sid version -> 1.14.4-2) rather than mutt-patched
for you?
mutt-patched does not exist anymore.
Control: tag -1 +moreinfo
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 04:37:54PM -0700, David Lawyer wrote:
> Package: mutt
> Version: 1.7.1-5
>
> Here's the /etc/rc.local script I use to set colors.
> Note that I send ESC[8] to set as default. Other programs such as vim
> restore the default colors after exiting b
Cc
Bcc:
Subject: Re: Bug#568832: [Mutt] #3486: "Attach:" pseudo-header cannot handle
filenames with newline
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To: <048.d8dd059aa74d60d347247acf21522...@mutt.org>
Control: severity -1 wishlist
To me this seems like a wishlist bug, rather than a proper bug, as there is a
way to
Control: tag -1 +moreinfo
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 08:04:54PM +0200, Piotr Lewandowski wrote:
> Package: mutt
> Version: 1.5.20-9
> Severity: normal
>
> Hello,
>
> mutt uses ncurses even if there is no such need, i.e.:
>
> - with '-p' option,
> - with '-Z' option if there is no new mail,
> -
Control: tag -1 +pending
This is in git now, it will come with 1.14.4-4.
Control: severity -1 wishlist
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 11:40:34AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Package: mutt
> Version: 1.5.21-5
> Severity: normal
>
> I selected an entire thread, and used ;b to bounce it to someone. mutt
> made a new connection to the SMTP server for each mail it bounced,
> in
Control: tag -1 +moreinfo
Many things in the imap source code in mutt where changed in the meantime, can
you check if it is still reproducible and provide us with a muttdebug log if
possible (please remove your password in that case).
Thanks!
tag -1 +moreinfo
thanks
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 06:38:04PM +0200, Kim Alvefur wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 06:19:30AM +0000, Antonio Radici wrote:
> > Could you please install the debug symbols and send the stacktrace again?
>
> Attached.
>
> > More info on how to d
tag -1 +moreinfo
thanks
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 12:48:17PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Control: found -1 1.8.3+neomutt20170609-1
>
> Hi Antonio,
>
> Axel Beckert wrote:
> > Antonio Radici wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 04:42:51PM +0200, Axel Beckert wro
tag -1 +pending
thanks
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 08:19:32AM +0200, Antonio Radici wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 04:04:37PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 10:41:37PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > Package: mutt
> > > Version: 1.14.3-
tag 839556 +moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
is bug reproducible with the latest version of mutt on debian (1.14.4-1)?
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 04:04:37PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 10:41:37PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > Package: mutt
> > Version: 1.14.3-1
> > Severity: important
> >
> > "important" because it makes a previously working configuration
> > unusable.
> >
> > The fix for
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 04:04:37PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 10:41:37PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > Package: mutt
> > Version: 1.14.3-1
> > Severity: important
> >
> > "important" because it makes a previously working configuration
> > unusable.
> >
> > The fix for
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 06:38:44PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Source: mutt
> Version: 1.14.0-1
> Severity: important
> Tags: security upstream
>
> Hi,
>
> The following vulnerability was published for mutt.
>
> CVE-2020-14093[0]:
> | Mutt before 1.14.3 allows an IMAP fcc/postpone man-i
Package: gqrx-sdr
Version: 2.12.1-1+b3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
gqrx does not start in testing, this renders the package unusable.
The problem is reproducible by spinning up a testing chroot (as of today) and
trying to start gqrx
This is the stacktrace:
***
Thread
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 12:18:14PM -0600, David Engel wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 05:52:59PM +0000, Antonio Radici wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 10:23:25AM -0600, David Engel wrote:
> > > Package: mutt
> > > Version: 1.12.2-1
> > > Severity: normal
On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 10:23:25AM -0600, David Engel wrote:
> Package: mutt
> Version: 1.12.2-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Beginning with version 1.12.2-1, Mutt fails GNU TLS handshake with the
> following error when connecting to an MS Exchange server:
>
> gnutls_handshake: A packet with illegal or
This is what I propose to write down in the release notes, feel free to adjust
as you see fit
Starting from Buster, the mutt package will be shipped again from the original
sources from https://www.mutt.org, this means that some of the features that
were previously available due to patches ap
Thanks for pinging me, I missed this, let me comment on the bug.
On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 02:51:35PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not sure if this release-notes bug that I addressed to you actually
> reached you.
>
> Paul
>
>
> Forwarded Message
> Subject: Bug#92835
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 12:03:03AM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 11:56:47PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > On 2018-12-06 22:52:32 [+0100], Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > > Source: cfengine2
> > > Severity: serious
> > >
> > > This is replaced by src:cfengine
On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 11:16:46AM +0100, Moritz Schlarb wrote:
> Source: cfengine3
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> please consider packaging the latest LTS release (3.12.1) before the Buster
> freezes begin.
>
> IMHO this makes sense if you look at the upstream support timeline at
On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 11:08:36AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Antonio,
>
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 09:55:59AM +0100, Antonio Radici wrote:
> > Package: mutt
> > Version: 1.7.2-1
> > Severity: grave
> > Tags: security upstream
> > Justification
Package: mutt
Version: 1.7.2-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream
Justification: security update
Tracking bug for security updates for mutt in stretch.
Details on https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/mutt
Patches are already provided by robe...@debian.org for jessie an
On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 05:51:18PM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> Package: mutt
> Severity: normal
>
> Now that the mutt package is back to an upstream version and a neomutt
> package exists, I keep seeing installations of people break left and
> right.
>
> While the case could be made that neo
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 07:40:09PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Package: mutt
> Version: 1.9.1-5
>
> Mutt crashes on this mbox:
>
> $ printf 'From Wed Nov 0 0: 0\nTo:=??B??=:\n' > nullptr.mbox
> $ mutt -R -f nullptr.mbox >/dev/null 2>&1
Thanks for the patch, I will do an upload tonight.
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 07:44:13PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> * Arthur Gautier [2017-11-28 18:08 +]:
>
> Sorry, my fault. I can now reproduce with 20171027 installed. This
> was fixed in git commit 55f99f3e three weeks ago. You should ask
> Antonio whether he'll backport that commit o
On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 11:19:33AM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Package: mutt
> Version: 1.9.1-4
> Severity: normal
>
> With the latest mutt package it appears that local email addresses are
> now created using the short host name instead of the FQDN as done
> previously.
>
> With the previous mutt
Tags: + pending
Hi Bob,
thanks for your report, I've fixed this in git, it will be included in 1.9.1-5
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 09:10:56AM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Package: mutt
> Version: 1.9.1-2
>
> The package description says "This package is built with the NeoMutt
> patchset", but this is no longer the case.
>
I've already fixed this in git, it will be in the next Debian release of this
pac
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 08:29:20AM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> * Antonio Radici [2017-11-21 08:58 +]:
>
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: anto...@debian.org
> >
> > * Package name: neomutt
> > Version : 1.
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 10:38:41AM -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Package: mutt
> Version: 1.9.1-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Freshly-created account, no muttrc, nothing
>
> tmpuser@host:~$ mutt
> Error in /etc/Muttrc.d/notmuch.rc, line 6: change-vfolder: no such function
> in map
> Error in /etc/
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: anto...@debian.org
* Package name: neomutt
Version : 1.9.1+20171027
Upstream Author : Richard Russon
* URL : http://www.neomutt.org
* License : GPLv2
Programming Lang: C
Description : NeoMutt is a command line mai
Can I please ask both of you to stop this flame?
It's not helping anyone.
I'm currently the maintainer of the mutt package and I have made my commitment
to Kevin in multiple occasions to fix the current situation and I'm going to fix
it.
I've collaborated with Kevin in the past and he has always
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 04:46:21PM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> debian-de...@lists.debian.org
> Bcc: Subject: Re: Bug#870635: mutt package is not using the official mutt
> tarball
> Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <2017074105.iz5bje4kgkl3q...@cherubino.dyne.org>
>
> CCing -devel because I think thi
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 04:46:21PM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> debian-de...@lists.debian.org
> Bcc: Subject: Re: Bug#870635: mutt package is not using the official mutt
> tarball
> Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <2017074105.iz5bje4kgkl3q...@cherubino.dyne.org>
>
> CCing -devel because I think thi
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 09:52:06AM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 10:21:51PM +0000, Antonio Radici wrote:
> > as I said on the original thread I'm planning to fix this, and as you
> > can see there have been no new releases until the fix is in pla
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 09:33:09AM -0700, Kevin McCarthy wrote:
> Package: mutt
> Version: 1.8.3+neomutt20170609-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 2.3
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I am the upstream project maintainer of Mutt. Your version of the
> "mutt" package in unstable and testing i
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 10:38:37AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> All good, at least the crash prompted me to look at this and update our
> exim config. Might not have noticed otherwise :)
>
Hi Julien,
this bug will be automatically closed by the 1.36-4 upload in uns
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 09:38:35PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Control: severity -1 normal
>
> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 19:27:09 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> > Source: postgrey
> > Version: 1.36-3
> > Severity: grave
> > User: debian-ad...@lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: needed-by-DSA-Team
>
Control: tags -1 + confirmed pending
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 10:49:14PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> Package: mutt
> Version: 1.8.3+neomutt20170609-2
> Severity: normal
> User: debian-p...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: perl-5.26-transition
>
> The mailspell helper uses POSIX::tmpnam(), which was depr
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 05:02:55PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> tags 866366 +patch
> thanks
>
> fd852e5556dc6c9194d5e72acce734321defe2f8 from upstream's repo (branch
> devel/expando, also attached) fixes this and applies cleanly on top of the
> package sources (I dropped it into debian/patches
Control: tag -1 + moreijnfo
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 01:47:14AM +, Sam Morris wrote:
> Package: mutt
> Version: 1.7.1-3
> Severity: normal
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> I triggered this by pressing space while at the end of a message.
> Backtrace attached...
Any c
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 06:38:32PM +0200, Nicolas Évrard wrote:
> Package: mutt
> Version: 1.7.0-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I use mutt with notmuch and I bound a key to change-vfolder.
> When this key is pressed if I use '?' insead of switching to a
Control: tags -1 + pending
Time to revisit this bug, probably worth changing the default at this point.
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 07:50:00PM +, Antonio Radici wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 12:14:29PM -0400, Peter Colberg wrote:
> > Control: reopen -1
> > Control: found -1 1.7.2-1
> > Control: tags -1 stretch
> >
> > > On 2017-06-24 18:49:55, Antonio Radici
1 - 100 of 745 matches
Mail list logo