On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 19:54:57 +0100, Mechtilde Stehmann
said:
> Hello Hubert, then I will prepare it for an upload. What is your
> preferred way? Should I do it as anew revision and register my name
> into debian/control? Or should I do it as NMU?
Since src/tex/noweb.sty is a generated file,
Hello Hubert,
then I will prepare it for an upload.
What is your preferred way?
Should I do it as anew revision and register my name into debian/control?
Or should I do it as NMU?
Kind regards
'Mechtilde
Am 16.01.23 um 03:57 schrieb Hubert Chathi:
On Sun, 15 Jan 2023 12:47:04 +0100, Mechtild
On Sun, 15 Jan 2023 12:47:04 +0100, Mechtilde Stehmann
said:
> At upstream there is an additional line, so there it is line 16.
> I also filled a patch. You can find a patch under
> https://github.com/nrnrnr/noweb/pull/28/files
Most of the changes look pretty straightforward, but why did you r
Package: noweb
Version: 2.12-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch upstream
X-Debbugs-Cc: uho...@debian.org, mechti...@debian.org
When I try to replace the documentclass book with scrbook, I get the message
/usr/share/texmf/tex/plain/misc/noweb.sty:15 contains an undefined control
sequence.
At upstre
4 matches
Mail list logo
