> So, since the manpage is no more included in your tarball, I suggest
> to remove the manpage installation call from Makefile: what about?
> (see further, anyhow)
Given that you were so kind to update the manpage, what about including
it in the tarball and then leave it in the Makefile as well?
Sandro Tosi wrote:
> So, since the manpage is no more included in your tarball, I suggest
> to remove the manpage installation call from Makefile: what about?
> (see further, anyhow)
Given that you were so kind to update the manpage, what about including
it in the tarball and then leave it in th
Hi all,
I'm packaging tstat (version 1.01) for Debian, and during this
activities I've noticed that in this package tstat.man is missing but
is still referenced in:
Makefile.in:286:$(INSTALL) -m 444 -o bin -g bin tstat.man
$(MANDIR)/man1/tstat.1
In 0.92 version package that file is prese
Dear Sandro,
First, let me thank you for the job you are doing.
Considering the tstat manpage, we didn't update it since we are updating
the HOWTO file. Since the Howto is wrinteen in POD, a manpage is
available "for free". See
http://tstat.tlc.polito.it/HOWTO/HOWTO.man
I guess that you can i
Hi Marco,
First, let me thank you for the job you are doing.
Considering the tstat manpage, we didn't update it since we are updating
the HOWTO file. Since the Howto is wrinteen in POD, a manpage is
available "for free". See
http://tstat.tlc.polito.it/HOWTO/HOWTO.man
So, since the manpage is n
Sandro Tosi wrote:
Hi Marco,
First, let me thank you for the job you are doing.
Considering the tstat manpage, we didn't update it since we are updating
the HOWTO file. Since the Howto is wrinteen in POD, a manpage is
available "for free". See
http://tstat.tlc.polito.it/HOWTO/HOWTO.man
So, s
6 matches
Mail list logo
