On 08.09.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi *,
> I'm sending this mail to you since you are listed at the bottom of the
> last build log of tetex-bin on powerpc (on voltaire).
>
>
> Or that the build environment is/was screwed on voltaire. Do you
> have any indications for this? W
Hi Ryan,
I'm sending this mail to you since you are listed at the bottom of the
last build log of tetex-bin on powerpc (on voltaire).
>> > > OK, I rebuilt tetex-bin and tetex-base 3.0-7 from experimental,
>> > > then I installed the produced packages. And voilà, I can
>> > > include png files aga
On 08.09.05 Wolfram Quester ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 03:22:44PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> > Wolfram Quester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> > > OK, I rebuilt tetex-bin and tetex-base 3.0-7 from experimental,
> > > then I installed the produced packages. And voilà,
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 03:22:44PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Wolfram Quester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...snip...]
> > OK, I rebuilt tetex-bin and tetex-base 3.0-7 from experimental, then I
> > installed the produced packages. And voilà, I can include png files
> > again. From the debugging so
On 08.09.05 Wolfram Quester ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 01:48:12PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Hi,
> > I can reproduce it on powerpc on sid, not on sarge (in the etch
> > chroot on bruckner, no tetex is installed, so I can' test.)
>
> BTW, I noticed that tetex-extra does
Wolfram Quester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 01:48:12PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Wolfram Quester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > Yes, I know this workaround and I'm using it ATM. Does this mean that you
>> > can reproduce this bug with the image I sen
Hi again,
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 01:48:12PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Wolfram Quester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Yes, I know this workaround and I'm using it ATM. Does this mean that you
> > can reproduce this bug with the image I sent you in?
>
> I can reproduce it on powerpc on sid,
Wolfram Quester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, I know this workaround and I'm using it ATM. Does this mean that you
> can reproduce this bug with the image I sent you in?
I can reproduce it on powerpc on sid, not on sarge (in the etch chroot
on bruckner, no tetex is installed, so I can' test.
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 10:47:32PM +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote:
> Wolfram Quester wrote:
>
> > The file is attached.
>
> Thanks. I can't offer a solution right now, but two possible workarounds:
>
> * The images looks as if it is created in a vector-graphics application
> like xfig. In that
On 07.09.05 Wolfram Quester ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 05:48:30PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Hi,
> > Wolfram Quester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...snip...]
> >
> > This trace doesn't say anything about png.
> >
> > > ii libpng12-01.2.8rel-1.0.1 PNG
Wolfram Quester wrote:
> The file is attached.
Thanks. I can't offer a solution right now, but two possible workarounds:
* The images looks as if it is created in a vector-graphics application
like xfig. In that case you could either directly produce a PDF image
from the drawing application or
Hi,
thanks for your reply.
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 05:48:30PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Wolfram Quester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...snip...]
>
> This trace doesn't say anything about png.
>
> > ii libpng12-01.2.8rel-1.0.1 PNG library - runtime
>
> That's the same version
Wolfram Quester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now pdflatex detects correctly that it should include the .png, but
> segfaults:
>
> Overfull \hbox (11.3373pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 153--174
> []/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/(Historical no-te: The na-mes `$/[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]/s$/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 2.0.2-31
Severity: important
Hi,
in former times I could use a line like
\includegraphics[height=0.3\textheight]{pics/VDE}
and latex would choose the right file (.eps for latex, .png for
pdflatex).
Now pdflatex detects correctly that it should include the .png, but
14 matches
Mail list logo
