Bug#330329: 2.6.12-10 built on my sparc pbuilder

2005-09-28 Thread dann frazier
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 23:50 -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 03:35:45PM +0900, Horms wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 11:32:29PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: > > > linux-2.6 2.6.12-10 built fine on my sparc pbuilder. I think the > > > build should be requeued, preferably on a

Bug#330329: 2.6.12-10 built on my sparc pbuilder

2005-09-28 Thread Blars Blarson
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 03:35:45PM +0900, Horms wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 11:32:29PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: > > linux-2.6 2.6.12-10 built fine on my sparc pbuilder. I think the > > build should be requeued, preferably on auric if it has more disk > > space available. > > Thanks for th

Bug#330329: 2.6.12-10 built on my sparc pbuilder

2005-09-27 Thread Horms
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 11:32:29PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: > linux-2.6 2.6.12-10 built fine on my sparc pbuilder. I think the > build should be requeued, preferably on auric if it has more disk > space available. Thanks for that information. I think Dannf was plaining to do a binary-upload. B

Bug#330329: 2.6.12-10 built on my sparc pbuilder

2005-09-27 Thread Blars Blarson
linux-2.6 2.6.12-10 built fine on my sparc pbuilder. I think the build should be requeued, preferably on auric if it has more disk space available. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]